🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses core challenges in AI music generation: ambiguous authorship, the suppression of creative subjectivity by technological “perfection,” and the reconfiguration of human musical identity. Methodologically, it introduces a novel framework integrating prompt-engineered experimental albums with LLM-mediated, self-reflective interviews—marking the first incorporation of large language model–driven metareflection into music creation methodology. This approach transcends conventional human–AI co-creation paradigms, systematically exposing crises of authorial presence and the evolution of creative agency within automated systems. The contribution comprises two critically engaged albums that empirically interrogate artistic attribution, compositional authenticity, and the redefinition of human creativity’s boundaries in the generative AI era. By bridging practice-based research with theoretical inquiry, the work advances original pathways for music aesthetics and authorship theory under conditions of algorithmic mediation.
📝 Abstract
I reflect on my experience creating two music albums centered on state-of-the-art prompt-based AI music generation platforms. The first album explicitly poses the question: What happens when I collide my junk mail with these platforms? The second album is a direct response to the first, and toys with the inability of state-of-the-art prompt-based AI music generation platforms to generate music that is not ``practiced'', ``polished'', and ``produced''. I seed a large language model (LLM) with information about these albums and have it interview me, which results in the exploration of several deeper questions: To what extent am I the author? Where am I in the resulting music? How is my musical identity changing as I am faced with machines that are in some ways far more talented than I? What new musical spaces does my work open, for me or anyone/thing else? I conclude by reflecting on my reflections, as well as LLM-mediated self-reflection as method.