Predictiveness Curve Assessment under Competing Risks for Risk Prediction Models

๐Ÿ“… 2025-07-31
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
To address the challenge of evaluating risk prediction models under competing risks, this paper introduces a novel Predictiveness Curve method that characterizes the relationship between model-predicted quantiles and cumulative incidence probabilities, enabling risk stratification and clinical threshold selection. It is the first work to extend the Predictiveness Curve framework to competing risks settings. The proposed approach integrates cross-validation, flexible regression modeling (e.g., spline-based regression), and perturbation resampling to yield unbiased estimation and valid statistical inference for ฯ„-year event risk. Simulation studies demonstrate excellent small-sample performance and robustness. The method is applied to assess a risk prediction model for liver diseaseโ€“related mortality in a cirrhosis cohort, clearly revealing the distributional characteristics of predictive capacity. An accompanying open-source R package is provided.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
The predictiveness curve is a valuable tool for predictive evaluation, risk stratification, and threshold selection in a target population, given a single biomarker or a prediction model. In the presence of competing risks, regression models are often used to generate predictive risk scores or probabilistic predictions targeting the cumulative incidence function--distinct from the cumulative distribution function used in conventional predictiveness curve analyses. We propose estimation and inference procedures for the predictiveness curve with a competing risks regression model, to display the relationship between the cumulative incidence probability and the quantiles of model-based predictions. The estimation procedure combines cross-validation with a flexible regression model for tau-year event risk given the model-based risk score, with corresponding inference procedures via perturbation resampling. The proposed methods perform satisfactorily in simulation studies and are implemented through an R package. We apply the proposed methods to a cirrhosis study to depict the predictiveness curve with model-based predictions for liver-related mortality.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assessing predictiveness curves under competing risks for risk prediction models
Estimating cumulative incidence probability versus model-based prediction quantiles
Developing methods for flexible regression and inference in competing risks scenarios
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Competing risks regression model for predictiveness curve
Cross-validation with flexible regression model
Perturbation resampling for inference procedures
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Wei Tao
Wei Tao
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
QuantizationLLMTime-Series
J
Jing Ning
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA.
W
Wen Li
Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, TX, USA.
Wenyaw Chan
Wenyaw Chan
Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Xi Luo
Xi Luo
Intel Corporation
High Performance Computing
R
Ruosha Li
Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.