SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation

📅 2026-06-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

203K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses a novel form of visual disinformation generated by generative AI that exhibits “synthetic credibility”—characterized by realistic textual embeddings and layout design—and provides the first systematic definition and quantification of this emerging deception paradigm. The authors construct a benchmark dataset comprising 600 AI-generated images spanning six credibility types and seven dissemination styles, complemented by 450 real-image negative samples (FP450) to enable detection evaluation under controlled false-positive rates. Large-scale comparative experiments involving multimodal large language models (MLLMs), open-source detectors, commercial APIs, and human annotators reveal significant limitations: at a 5% false-positive rate, the best commercial API achieves only 57.6% true-positive rate, MLLMs average 10.5%, and humans reach 63%. These findings underscore the urgent need for detection models to move beyond superficial features toward fine-grained, robust reasoning about deep synthetic credibility cues.
📝 Abstract
Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility. We introduce SYNCRED-Bench, a benchmark of 600 AI-generated misinformation images balanced across six credible-form categories and seven fine-grained circulation styles, together with FP450, a real-image negative set for measuring false positives. Extensive evaluation shows that existing systems remain unreliable: under a 5% false-positive-rate constraint, 15 MLLMs achieve only 10.5% true positive rate (TPR), open-source AIGC detectors achieve less than 5%, and commercial APIs reach 57.6%. Human annotators also struggled to identify synthetic credibility, reaching only 63% TPR. These findings establish synthetic credibility as a severe and underexplored visual misinformation challenge, and provide a benchmark for developing detectors that reason beyond superficial credibility cues.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

synthetic credibility
visual misinformation
AI-generated images
credibility assessment
misinformation detection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

synthetic credibility
visual misinformation
AI-generated images
benchmark
credibility detection