🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes a systematic formalization of all published mathematical knowledge into a machine-verifiable, continuously evolving structured knowledge base, addressing the challenges of scalability and organization. Taking dilatations of categories in categorical algebra as the first case study, the project integrates interactive theorem proving, dependent type theory, and category theory to frame the complete formalization of mathematics as a universal reasoning benchmark. By constructing a formal prototype of category dilatations, the study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach in expressing complex algebraic structures, thereby establishing both an architectural foundation and a practical pathway toward a large-scale, interconnected, and extensible database of formalized mathematics.
📝 Abstract
Formal rigor distinguishes mathematics from other disciplines, in the sense that mathematical statements are derived from explicit axioms by logically verifiable steps. Interactive theorem provers support this by expressing definitions, theorems, and proofs in a fully formal language and verifying them mechanically. We consider the benchmark problem of formalizing all published mathematics as a machine verifiable and continuously updated corpus of mathematical knowledge. This viewpoint treats mathematics as a structured database of interdependent results and raises questions about scalability and organization of large formal libraries. As a case study, we present an ongoing formalization in categorical algebra, namely dilatations of categories, extending classical localizations and illustrating what such an implementation looks like in practice.