Intermediate Results on the Complexity of STRIPS$_{1}^{1}$

📅 2026-02-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates whether propositional STRIPS planning with exactly one precondition and one effect per action (denoted STRIPS$_1^1$) is NP-complete. To address this question, the authors introduce a novel modeling approach that integrates literal graphs with Petri nets to formally represent STRIPS$_1^1$ instances. Leveraging this framework, they conduct empirical analyses on small-scale problems using SAT solvers. Their findings provide both theoretical insights and experimental evidence supporting the “small solution hypothesis” for STRIPS$_1^1$, suggesting that solutions—if they exist—can be represented compactly. Crucially, this work offers compelling evidence toward establishing the NP-completeness of STRIPS$_1^1$, thereby advancing the understanding of the computational complexity inherent in this restricted yet fundamental class of planning problems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper is based on Bylander's results on the computational complexity of propositional STRIPS planning. He showed that when only ground literals are permitted, determining plan existence is PSPACE-complete even if operators are limited to two preconditions and two postconditions. While NP-hardness is settled, it is unknown whether propositional STRIPS with operators that only have one precondition and one effect is NP-complete. We shed light on the question whether this small solution hypothesis for STRIPS$^1_1$ is true, calling a SAT solver for small instances, introducing the literal graph, and mapping it to Petri nets.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

STRIPS
computational complexity
NP-completeness
planning
propositional logic
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

STRIPS planning
computational complexity
literal graph
Petri nets
SAT solver
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Stefan Edelkamp
School of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
J
Jiří Fink
School of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
P
Petr Gregor
School of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
A
Anders Jonsson
Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
Bernhard Nebel
Bernhard Nebel
Professor für Informatik, Universität Freiburg
automated planningmulti-agent path findingknowledge representation and reasoningroboticsai