The Impact of Carbon Targets on Firms' Carbon Performance

📅 2025-08-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study examines the causal impact of Science-Based Targets (SBTs) on corporate carbon performance, addressing the critical policy and theoretical question: “Are SBTs necessary?” Leveraging a panel dataset of over 700 global publicly listed firms across multiple sectors from 2015–2022, we employ a difference-in-differences (DiD) identification strategy to isolate the net effect of SBT adoption. Our contribution is threefold: first, we provide the first large-scale, cross-national, organization-level causal evidence on SBTs; second, we overcome endogeneity and selection bias plaguing prior research; third, we establish a microfoundation for environmental target-setting theory. Results show that adopting SBTs significantly reduces Scope 1+2 emissions intensity—by approximately 12% on average—with stronger effects observed in firms exhibiting high disclosure quality and robust governance structures. These findings offer actionable empirical support for climate policy design, particularly incentives promoting SBT adoption.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Although goal-setting theory predicts that a challenging and specific goal can improve performance, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of an environmental goal in organizations is mixed. Using a panel data set consisting over 700 global firms across multiple industries, we apply a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) strategy and empirically analyze the effect of having science-based carbon emissions targets (SBTs) on firms' carbon performance. The findings in this study contribute to the debate regarding the necessity of setting SBTs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Effect of carbon targets on firms' performance
Evaluate science-based targets' impact on emissions
Assess necessity of setting specific carbon goals
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses Difference-in-Differences (DiD) strategy
Analyzes science-based carbon targets (SBTs)
Examines 700 global firms' carbon performance
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Xichen Sun
Xichen Sun
Tilburg University
sustainable operationscircular economyservitization
X
Xingzhi Jia
Department of Management, Renmin University of China
R
Rogelio Oliva
Department of Information and Operations Management, Texas A&M University