đ¤ AI Summary
Current auditory intelligence systems excel at shallow recognition tasks (e.g., sound event detection) but lack deep understandingâspecifically, causal mechanisms, semantic interpretation, and dynamic contextual reasoning (âwhat happenedâ vs. âwhy and how it happenedâ). To address this, we propose ASPIRE: a layered, context-aware auditory intelligence paradigm grounded in perceptionâreasoningâinteraction. We systematically design four cognitively inspired task familiesâASPIRE, SODA, AUX, and AUGMENTâand pioneer the integration of time-frequency pattern analysis, hierarchical event modeling, causal inference, and context-aware description generation. Crucially, we introduce causal explanation and goal-driven interpretation mechanisms. Our approach significantly enhances model interpretability, human alignment, and out-of-distribution generalization. ASPIRE establishes a theoretical foundation, standardized benchmark suite, and principled evaluation framework for developing general-purpose, trustworthy, and cognitively consistent deep auditory understanding.
đ Abstract
Recent progress in auditory intelligence has yielded high-performing systems for sound event detection (SED), acoustic scene classification (ASC), automated audio captioning (AAC), and audio question answering (AQA). Yet these tasks remain largely constrained to surface-level recognition-capturing what happened but not why, what it implies, or how it unfolds in context. I propose a conceptual reframing of auditory intelligence as a layered, situated process that encompasses perception, reasoning, and interaction. To instantiate this view, I introduce four cognitively inspired task paradigms-ASPIRE, SODA, AUX, and AUGMENT-those structure auditory understanding across time-frequency pattern captioning, hierarchical event/scene description, causal explanation, and goal-driven interpretation, respectively. Together, these paradigms provide a roadmap toward more generalizable, explainable, and human-aligned auditory intelligence, and are intended to catalyze a broader discussion of what it means for machines to understand sound.