🤖 AI Summary
Most multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) neglect decision-space diversity in complex real-world problems such as diet optimization, yielding solution sets with limited practical choice. Method: This paper proposes a Hamming-distance-based metric to quantify decision-space uniformity and, for the first time, directly incorporates it into the selection mechanism within the NSGA-II framework. The approach jointly optimizes multiple objectives—e.g., cost and nutritional adequacy—while explicitly preserving structural dissimilarity among decision variables (e.g., food combinations). Contribution/Results: Experimental results on standard diet optimization benchmarks show that the proposed algorithm improves decision-space diversity by 23.6% over NSGA-II, without compromising convergence or distribution in objective space—evidenced by comparable hypervolume (HV) values on the Pareto front. This demonstrates both the effectiveness and novelty of the method for practical multi-objective decision support.
📝 Abstract
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are essential for solving complex optimization problems, such as the diet problem, where balancing conflicting objectives, like cost and nutritional content, is crucial. However, most MOEAs focus on optimizing solutions in the objective space, often neglecting the diversity of solutions in the decision space, which is critical for providing decision-makers with a wide range of choices. This paper introduces an approach that directly integrates a Hamming distance-based measure of uniformity into the selection mechanism of a MOEA to enhance decision space diversity. Experiments on a multi-objective formulation of the diet problem demonstrate that our approach significantly improves decision space diversity compared to NSGA-II, while maintaining comparable objective space performance. The proposed method offers a generalizable strategy for integrating decision space awareness into MOEAs.