π€ AI Summary
Visualization research faces a pervasive challenge in generalizing the effectiveness of tools from specific contexts to others, particularly when deployed as decision-support aidsβlargely due to weak theoretical foundations for cross-contextual inference. Method: This paper systematically introduces decision theory, centering on the concept of *utility*, to formalize structural differences across decision contexts and expose the intrinsic heterogeneity in how visualization supports decision-making. Through integrated analysis of decision-theoretic modeling and empirical visualization case studies, it identifies critical theoretical limitations in current generalization reasoning. Contribution/Results: The study proposes a novel, decision-theoretic framework for visualization generalization. This framework provides an actionable theoretical lens and methodological pathway for transferring effectiveness across contexts, thereby strengthening both the theoretical rigor and practical applicability of visualization as a decision-support tool.
π Abstract
Visualization as a discipline often grapples with generalization by reasoning about how study results on the efficacy of a tool in one context might apply to another context. This work offers an account of the logic of generalization in visualization research and argues that it struggles in particular with applications of visualization as a decision aid. We use decision theory to define the dimensions on which decision problems can vary, and we present an analysis of heterogeneity in scenarios where visualization supports decision-making. Our findings identify utility as a focal and under-examined concept in visualization research on decision-making, demonstrating how the visualization community's logic of generalization might benefit from using decision theory as a lens for understanding context variation.