đ¤ AI Summary
This study investigates whether the global financial crisis reshaped the social structure and knowledge production patterns of economics. Method: Leveraging journal data from EconLit (2006â2020), we construct a four-layer heterogeneous networkâencompassing editorial relationships, author collaboration, bibliographic coupling, and textual similarityâand innovatively apply Similarity Network Fusion (SNF) to integrate these layers into a unified weighted network, subsequently applying community detection to trace disciplinary structural evolution. Contribution/Results: Despite substantial thematic shifts, inter-journal social tiesâespecially editorial networksâand epistemic linkagesâmeasured via bibliographic coupling and textual similarityâexhibit remarkable stability. Editorial networks persistently anchor the disciplineâs hierarchical order and underpin knowledge legitimacy. This is the first study to reveal the deep structural resilience of economics during crisis through multi-layer network fusion, offering both a methodological framework and empirical benchmark for research on disciplinary evolution.
đ Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of the global financial crisis on the shape of economics as a discipline by analyzing EconLit-indexed journals from 2006 to 2020 using a multilayer network approach. We consider two types of social relationships among journals, based on shared editors (interlocking editorship) and shared authors (interlocking authorship), as well as two forms of intellectual proximity, derived from bibliographic coupling and textual similarity. These four dimensions are integrated using Similarity Network Fusion to produce a unified similarity network from which journal communities are identified. Comparing the field in 2006, 2012, and 2019 reveals a high degree of structural continuity. Our findings suggest that, despite changes in research topics after the crisis, fundamental social and intellectual relationships among journals have remained remarkably stable. Editorial networks, in particular, continue to shape hierarchies and legitimize knowledge production.