Scalable Out-of-distribution Robustness in the Presence of Unobserved Confounders

📅 2024-11-29
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 1
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the out-of-distribution (OOD) robust generalization problem under unobserved confounding: an unobserved variable (Z) jointly influences both input (X) and label (Y), inducing predictor heterogeneity ((P(Y|X) = mathbb{E}_{Z|X}[P(Y|X,Z)])). Critically, (Z) is latent during training, its distribution shifts between training and test domains ((P^{ ext{te}}(Z) eq P^{ ext{tr}}(Z))), and test inputs (X) are inaccessible—rendering standard covariate/label shift assumptions invalid. To overcome limitations of existing methods—such as reliance on multiple auxiliary variables or complex modeling—we propose a set of lightweight, identifiability-enabling assumptions. Based thereon, we construct a structurally simple and scalable expected conditional average predictor (mathbb{E}_{P^{ ext{te}}(Z)}[f_Z(X)]), integrating invariant feature learning with confounding-robust estimation. Theoretically grounded, our approach achieves significant accuracy improvements on standard OOD benchmarks, while enjoying linear time complexity and strong scalability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We consider the task of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, where the distribution shift is due to an unobserved confounder ($Z$) affecting both the covariates ($X$) and the labels ($Y$). In this setting, traditional assumptions of covariate and label shift are unsuitable due to the confounding, which introduces heterogeneity in the predictor, i.e., $hat{Y} = f_Z(X)$. OOD generalization differs from traditional domain adaptation by not assuming access to the covariate distribution ($X^ ext{te}$) of the test samples during training. These conditions create a challenging scenario for OOD robustness: (a) $Z^ ext{tr}$ is an unobserved confounder during training, (b) $P^ ext{te}{Z} eq P^ ext{tr}{Z}$, (c) $X^ ext{te}$ is unavailable during training, and (d) the posterior predictive distribution depends on $P^ ext{te}(Z)$, i.e., $hat{Y} = E_{P^ ext{te}(Z)}[f_Z(X)]$. In general, accurate predictions are unattainable in this scenario, and existing literature has proposed complex predictors based on identifiability assumptions that require multiple additional variables. Our work investigates a set of identifiability assumptions that tremendously simplify the predictor, whose resulting elegant simplicity outperforms existing approaches.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Address OOD generalization with unobserved confounders
Handle distribution shift without test covariates
Simplify predictors using single additional variable
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses single additional variable for identifiability
Addresses unobserved confounders in OOD generalization
Simplifies predictor without multiple extra variables
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.