Agentic Design Review System

📅 2025-08-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of multi-dimensional collaborative analysis in automated graphic design evaluation. We propose a multi-agent collaborative review framework featuring a meta-agent that orchestrates specialized agents for composition, color harmony, and aesthetics. Crucially, we integrate graph-matching-driven contextual example selection with prompt expansion strategies to endow each agent with design-aware reasoning capabilities. Leveraging a multi-agent architecture, structured prompt engineering, and in-context learning, our framework delivers cross-dimensional, consistent, interpretable evaluations and actionable feedback. Evaluated on our newly constructed DRS-BENCH benchmark, it significantly outperforms existing methods. Ablation studies confirm the critical contributions of both graph-matching-based example selection and prompt expansion to assessment quality and feedback utility.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Evaluating graphic designs involves assessing it from multiple facets like alignment, composition, aesthetics and color choices. Evaluating designs in a holistic way involves aggregating feedback from individual expert reviewers. Towards this, we propose an Agentic Design Review System (AgenticDRS), where multiple agents collaboratively analyze a design, orchestrated by a meta-agent. A novel in-context exemplar selection approach based on graph matching and a unique prompt expansion method plays central role towards making each agent design aware. Towards evaluating this framework, we propose DRS-BENCH benchmark. Thorough experimental evaluation against state-of-the-art baselines adapted to the problem setup, backed-up with critical ablation experiments brings out the efficacy of Agentic-DRS in evaluating graphic designs and generating actionable feedback. We hope that this work will attract attention to this pragmatic, yet under-explored research direction.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating graphic designs from multiple facets like alignment and aesthetics
Aggregating feedback from individual expert reviewers holistically
Proposing a benchmark for design review systems (DRS-BENCH)
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-agent collaboration orchestrated by meta-agent
Graph matching for in-context exemplar selection
Prompt expansion method enhances design awareness
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.