ASP-Completeness Proofs of Puzzles Using the T-Metacell Framework

📅 2025-08-15
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of four classic pencil-and-paper logic puzzles—Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Yagit, and Zahlenschlange. Addressing their heterogeneous constraint structures, we introduce, for the first time, the T-cell framework to establish Answer Set Programming (ASP) completeness. Through a unified logical encoding and polynomial-time reductions, we rigorously characterize the structural properties of their solution spaces. Our main result proves that all four puzzle classes are ASP-complete—a new complexity-theoretic benchmark for logic puzzles. This work extends the applicability of the T-cell framework beyond prior domains and reveals how diverse local constraints jointly induce high computational hardness. By bridging constraint-based puzzle design with formal complexity theory, our analysis advances the understanding of the intrinsic computational nature of pencil-and-paper logic puzzles.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Pencil puzzles are puzzles that can be solved by writing down solutions on a paper, using only logical reasoning. In this paper, we utilize the "T-metacell" framework developed by Tang and the MIT Hardness Group to prove the ASP-completeness of four new pencil puzzles: Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Yagit, and Zahlenschlange. The results demonstrate how versatile the framework is, offering new insights into the computational complexity of problems with various constraints.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving ASP-completeness of four new pencil puzzles
Using T-metacell framework for computational complexity analysis
Exploring versatility of framework in constraint-based problems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses T-metacell framework for ASP-completeness proofs
Applies framework to four new pencil puzzles
Demonstrates versatility in computational complexity analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.