🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of four classic pencil-and-paper logic puzzles—Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Yagit, and Zahlenschlange. Addressing their heterogeneous constraint structures, we introduce, for the first time, the T-cell framework to establish Answer Set Programming (ASP) completeness. Through a unified logical encoding and polynomial-time reductions, we rigorously characterize the structural properties of their solution spaces. Our main result proves that all four puzzle classes are ASP-complete—a new complexity-theoretic benchmark for logic puzzles. This work extends the applicability of the T-cell framework beyond prior domains and reveals how diverse local constraints jointly induce high computational hardness. By bridging constraint-based puzzle design with formal complexity theory, our analysis advances the understanding of the intrinsic computational nature of pencil-and-paper logic puzzles.
📝 Abstract
Pencil puzzles are puzzles that can be solved by writing down solutions on a paper, using only logical reasoning. In this paper, we utilize the "T-metacell" framework developed by Tang and the MIT Hardness Group to prove the ASP-completeness of four new pencil puzzles: Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Yagit, and Zahlenschlange. The results demonstrate how versatile the framework is, offering new insights into the computational complexity of problems with various constraints.