🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates how physical office environments influence group affective dynamics in collaborative teams and examines employees’ acceptance of and ethical concerns regarding intelligent affect-sensing technologies. Using qualitative methods—including contextual interviews and participatory observation—the research identifies key environmental factors (e.g., spatial configuration, lighting, acoustics, and privacy) that modulate collective emotional states. It further uncovers core employee expectations concerning data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and user autonomy. The study proposes a “human-centered, privacy-first” design framework for intelligent workplaces, asserting that affect-aware technologies should augment—not supplant—individual and collective emotion regulation. Findings contribute both theoretical insights and actionable guidelines for developing next-generation office environments that ethically balance group well-being, regulatory compliance, and adaptive responsiveness. (138 words)
📝 Abstract
Group mood plays a crucial role in shaping workspace experiences, influencing group dynamics, team performance, and creativity. The perceived group mood depends on many, often subconscious, aspects such as individual emotional states or group life, which make it challenging to maintain a positive atmosphere. Intelligent technology could support mood regulation in physical office environments, for example, as adaptive ambient lighting for mood regulation. However, little is known about the relationship between the physical workspace and group mood dynamics. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a qualitative user study (N=8 workgroups and overall 26 participants) to explore how the physical workspace shapes group mood experiences and investigate employees' perspectives on intelligent mood-aware technologies. Our findings reveal key factors influencing group mood, and participants' expectations for supportive technology to preserve privacy and autonomy. Our work highlights the potential of adaptive and responsive workspaces while also emphasizing the need for human-centered, technology-driven interventions that benefit group well-being.