๐ค AI Summary
ๆฌๆๆๅบไธ็งๅฉ็จ้ช่ฏๅ้ฆๆน่ฟๅ้้็ๆนๆณVRR๏ผ้่ฟไฟฎๅคๅ้ๆฐ้ๆฉๆๅๅคงๆจกๅๆง่ฝใ
๐ Abstract
Verifier-based selection improves LLM performance by generating multiple candidate solutions and using a verifier to select the most promising one. However, existing methods typically treat verification only as a ranking step and discard its feedback once a fixed candidate pool has been evaluated. In this paper, we ask whether verification can also improve the candidate set itself. To this end, we introduce LLM-as-an-Improver and propose Verify--Repair--Reselect (VRR), which uses verification feedback to generate and reselect improved candidates. VRR retains the initial winner while conditionally generating three complementary alternatives: repaired versions of the winner and runner-up, and a solution based on a new approach. It filters invalid and duplicate candidates using only inference-time information and then reselects the final answer under the original evaluation criteria. Across diverse models and code-generation and reasoning benchmarks, VRR improves over fixed-pool verifier-based selection in many settings and can recover correct solutions even when all candidates in the initial pool are incorrect. These results highlight a broader role for LLMs as improvers: verification feedback can not only select among existing solutions but also construct stronger candidates beyond the initial pool.