PosteriorBench: From Point Estimates to Posterior Matching in Evaluating Generative Inverse Solvers

📅 2026-09-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
为了解决生成模型在处理科学逆问题时无法准确捕捉真实后验分布的问题,研究引入了PosteriorBench基准,通过多个物理逆问题和五种度量标准评估生成模型的分布准确性。
📝 Abstract
Generative models are increasingly used to solve scientific inverse problems, but existing evaluations still focus primarily on whether a method can produce a single plausible reconstruction. This is insufficient for ill-posed problems, where multiple solutions may be consistent with the same sparse or noisy observations. In these settings, a method can achieve strong pointwise accuracy while still failing to capture the true posterior through mode collapse, overconfident uncertainty, or averaging incompatible solutions. We introduce PosteriorBench, a benchmark for evaluating the distributional accuracy of generative inverse solvers. PosteriorBench evaluates four physics-based inverse problems: Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference. For each task, we construct high-fidelity reference posteriors using computationally heavy but established procedures such as rejection sampling and Markov chain Monte Carlo, enabling direct assessment of whether solvers recover the full set of solutions rather than the single best sample. We pair these references with a five-metric posterior evaluation suite: posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error. These metrics assess pointwise accuracy, marginal uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity. The benchmark spans sparse sensing, low-resolution observations, nonlinear forward models, varying noise levels, and multimodal priors, with a unified pipeline for distribution matching and uncertainty quantification. Our experiments reveal substantial distribution-matching gaps across current solvers, while showing that neural operators improve resolution robustness, and guidance weights and generation noise are key to posterior-variance calibration.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

generative models
inverse problems
posterior distribution
mode collapse
uncertainty
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

PosteriorBench
distributional accuracy
generative inverse solvers
posterior evaluation suite
uncertainty quantification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Jiachen Yao
Jiachen Yao
Caltech
scientific machine learningneural operatorgenerative AI
Z
Zi-Siang Hsu
National Taiwan University
X
Xi Deng
California Institute of Technology
A
Aditi Gupta
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
X
Xin Ju
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University
S
Sally M Benson
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University
Gege Wen
Gege Wen
Assistant Professor, Imperial College London
Subsurface flowMachine learning
Anima Anandkumar
Anima Anandkumar
California Institute of Technology and NVIDIA
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence