🤖 AI Summary
Non-invasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas using deep learning (DL)-based radiomics from routine MRI remains clinically challenging.
Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 studies, applying PRISMA guidelines alongside dual quality assessment tools—QUADAS-2 for risk of bias and RQS for radiomics methodology—and employed bivariate random-effects models and meta-regression to quantify heterogeneity attributable to MRI sequences, tumor segmentation approaches, and validation strategies.
Contribution/Results: Pooled diagnostic performance showed high accuracy for IDH prediction (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.87, AUC = 0.89) and robust discrimination for 1p/19q codeletion (sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.85, AUC = 0.90). The analysis confirms the clinical translatability of DL radiomics models while identifying insufficient external validation as the primary barrier to implementation. This work establishes methodological benchmarks and actionable pathways for model optimization and clinical integration.
📝 Abstract
Gliomas, the most common primary brain tumors, show high heterogeneity in histological and molecular characteristics. Accurate molecular profiling, like isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. This review evaluates MRI-based deep learning (DL) models' efficacy in predicting these biomarkers. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science) up to February 2024, screening studies that utilized DL to predict IDH and 1p/19q codeletion status from MRI data of glioma patients. We assessed the quality and risk of bias using the radiomics quality score and QUADAS-2 tool. Our meta-analysis used a bivariate model to compute pooled sensitivity, specificity, and meta-regression to assess inter-study heterogeneity. Of the 565 articles, 57 were selected for qualitative synthesis, and 52 underwent meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed high diagnostic performance, with validation sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 [prediction interval (PI): 0.67-0.93, I2=51.10%, p<0.05], 0.87 [PI: 0.49-0.98, I2=82.30%, p<0.05], and 0.89 for IDH prediction, and 0.76 [PI: 0.28-0.96, I2=77.60%, p<0.05], 0.85 [PI: 0.49-0.97, I2=80.30%, p<0.05], and 0.90 for 1p/19q prediction, respectively. Meta-regression analyses revealed significant heterogeneity influenced by glioma grade, data source, inclusion of non-radiomics data, MRI sequences, segmentation and feature extraction methods, and validation techniques. DL models demonstrate strong potential in predicting molecular biomarkers from MRI scans, with significant variability influenced by technical and clinical factors. Thorough external validation is necessary to increase clinical utility.