Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning for Predicting Gliomas' IDH and 1p/19q Status in MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

📅 2024-10-28
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Non-invasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status in gliomas using deep learning (DL)-based radiomics from routine MRI remains clinically challenging. Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 studies, applying PRISMA guidelines alongside dual quality assessment tools—QUADAS-2 for risk of bias and RQS for radiomics methodology—and employed bivariate random-effects models and meta-regression to quantify heterogeneity attributable to MRI sequences, tumor segmentation approaches, and validation strategies. Contribution/Results: Pooled diagnostic performance showed high accuracy for IDH prediction (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.87, AUC = 0.89) and robust discrimination for 1p/19q codeletion (sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.85, AUC = 0.90). The analysis confirms the clinical translatability of DL radiomics models while identifying insufficient external validation as the primary barrier to implementation. This work establishes methodological benchmarks and actionable pathways for model optimization and clinical integration.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Gliomas, the most common primary brain tumors, show high heterogeneity in histological and molecular characteristics. Accurate molecular profiling, like isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. This review evaluates MRI-based deep learning (DL) models' efficacy in predicting these biomarkers. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science) up to February 2024, screening studies that utilized DL to predict IDH and 1p/19q codeletion status from MRI data of glioma patients. We assessed the quality and risk of bias using the radiomics quality score and QUADAS-2 tool. Our meta-analysis used a bivariate model to compute pooled sensitivity, specificity, and meta-regression to assess inter-study heterogeneity. Of the 565 articles, 57 were selected for qualitative synthesis, and 52 underwent meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed high diagnostic performance, with validation sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 [prediction interval (PI): 0.67-0.93, I2=51.10%, p<0.05], 0.87 [PI: 0.49-0.98, I2=82.30%, p<0.05], and 0.89 for IDH prediction, and 0.76 [PI: 0.28-0.96, I2=77.60%, p<0.05], 0.85 [PI: 0.49-0.97, I2=80.30%, p<0.05], and 0.90 for 1p/19q prediction, respectively. Meta-regression analyses revealed significant heterogeneity influenced by glioma grade, data source, inclusion of non-radiomics data, MRI sequences, segmentation and feature extraction methods, and validation techniques. DL models demonstrate strong potential in predicting molecular biomarkers from MRI scans, with significant variability influenced by technical and clinical factors. Thorough external validation is necessary to increase clinical utility.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating deep learning performance for glioma molecular classification
Assessing noninvasive prediction of IDH and 1p/19q status
Identifying methodological factors affecting diagnostic accuracy generalizability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deep learning for noninvasive glioma molecular classification
MRI-based radiomics with automated tumor segmentation
Multi-center data harmonization using style transfer
S
Somayeh Farahani
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
M
Marjaneh Hejazi
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
M
M. Tabassum
Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
A
A. Ieva
Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
N
Neda Mahdavifar
Department of epidemiology & biostatistics, school of public health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sidong Liu
Sidong Liu
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
Medical Image ComputingComputational NeurosciencePersonalized Oncology