More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage

📅 2026-04-19
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge that vision-language models struggle to accurately ground abstract semantics—such as idiomatic meanings of compound nouns—in high-fidelity image generation, where increased visual realism can interfere with compositional semantic understanding. To this end, the authors introduce the DIVA benchmark, which employs diagrammatic images to separately anchor literal and idiomatic interpretations. They further propose, for the first time, architecture-agnostic metrics: a semantic alignment gap (Δ) and a directional bias b(t), to quantify the disparity in visual grounding between these two semantic types. Experiments across eight state-of-the-art models reveal a pervasive literalness bias that persists despite model scaling and intensifies with higher visual fidelity, suggesting that iconographic abstraction enhances symbolic semantic alignment.

Technology Category

Computer Vision: Language and VisionNatural Language Processing: Language Grounding & Multi-modal NLPMachine Learning: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)

Application Category

Semantics and Knowledge: Methods to enhance, augment, integrate or synergize semantic models such as knowledge graphs and LLMsSearch and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web evaluation methodologies and metricsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Foundation models and LLMs for Web-related graphs
📝 Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings. We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap ($Δ$), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding. We additionally introduce a directional signed bias $b(t)$ to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference. Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Vision-Language Models
idiomatic interpretation
semantic grounding
visual abstraction
compositional understanding
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Vision-Language Models
Semantic Alignment Gap
Idiomatic Compositionality
Iconic Abstraction
Literal Superiority Bias
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
W
Wei He
IDSAI, University of Exeter