🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of deriving personalized, actionable physiological counterfactual insights from long-term, multivariate wearable time-series data to support hypothesis testing and individualized lifestyle interventions. We propose a novel framework integrating multimodal similarity enhancement with temporal causal discovery: (1) multimodal representation learning identifies physiologically similar individuals; (2) an enhanced temporal PC algorithm uncovers dynamic causal structures among physiological variables; and (3) gradient-boosted machines model the physiological response mechanism from time *t−1* to *t*. Our approach significantly improves counterfactual trajectory prediction reliability (median plausibility: 0.9643) and accuracy (heart rate MAE: 4.71 bpm). Crucially, it enables the first interpretable, individual-specific modeling of heterogeneous intervention responses—overcoming key limitations of population-level causal inference. This work establishes a new paradigm for precision health interventions grounded in temporally aware, causally informed, and person-centered analytics.
📝 Abstract
Wearable sensor data offer opportunities for personalized health monitoring, yet deriving actionable insights from their complex, longitudinal data streams is challenging. This paper introduces a framework to learn personalized counterfactual models from multivariate wearable data. This enables exploring what-if scenarios to understand potential individual-specific outcomes of lifestyle choices. Our approach first augments individual datasets with data from similar patients via multi-modal similarity analysis. We then use a temporal PC (Peter-Clark) algorithm adaptation to discover predictive relationships, modeling how variables at time t-1 influence physiological changes at time t. Gradient Boosting Machines are trained on these discovered relationships to quantify individual-specific effects. These models drive a counterfactual engine projecting physiological trajectories under hypothetical interventions (e.g., activity or sleep changes). We evaluate the framework via one-step-ahead predictive validation and by assessing the plausibility and impact of interventions. Evaluation showed reasonable predictive accuracy (e.g., mean heart rate MAE 4.71 bpm) and high counterfactual plausibility (median 0.9643). Crucially, these interventions highlighted significant inter-individual variability in response to hypothetical lifestyle changes, showing the framework's potential for personalized insights. This work provides a tool to explore personalized health dynamics and generate hypotheses on individual responses to lifestyle changes.