Sample Complexity of Multicalibration for Multilevel Properties

📅 2026-08-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the problem of multi-group multi-calibration, wherein the goal is to achieve simultaneous calibration across $k$ hierarchical statistical attributes—such as mean, variance, and value-at-risk—while minimizing sample complexity. The authors propose a randomized learning algorithm applicable to any finite family of groups and establish the first tight upper and lower bounds on sample complexity, revealing a fundamental dependence of $\varepsilon^{-(k+2)}$ on the desired calibration error $\varepsilon$ and the number $k$ of attribute levels. Leveraging tools from probability theory, statistical learning theory, and regularity conditions, they prove that for group families of polynomial size, the required sample complexity is $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)})$. The universality of this bound is further validated across three canonical sequences of statistical attributes.
📝 Abstract
Calibration requires a predictor to be unbiased after conditioning on its own predictions. Multicalibration asks for this guarantee simultaneously across a collection of groups. Many prediction tasks ask for several related features of the same conditional outcome distribution: variance is defined relative to the mean, skewness relative to both mean and variance, and conditional value at risk relative to a quantile. We study multicalibration for a sequence of $k$ properties in which each property is identifiable once the preceding properties are fixed. This framework includes Bayes pairs but does not require the properties to arise from a single loss. For every fixed $k\ge2$, we establish matching upper and lower sample-complexity bounds up to logarithmic factors under regularity conditions. Even with only polylogarithmically many binary groups, achieving multicalibration error $\varepsilon$ requires $\widetildeΩ(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)})$ samples. Conversely, for any finite group family $\mathcal G$, we give a randomized learner using $O(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)}+\varepsilon^{-2}\log|\mathcal G|)$ samples. Thus the sample complexity is $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)})$ for polynomial-size group families. We instantiate the theory for three canonical examples.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

multicalibration
sample complexity
multilevel properties
conditional calibration
statistical learning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

multicalibration
sample complexity
multilevel properties
conditional calibration
Bayes pairs
🔎 Similar Papers