Predicting brain tumour enhancement from non-contrast MR imaging with artificial intelligence

📅 2025-08-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in brain tumor MRI pose risks including nephrotoxicity, allergic reactions, and limitations in pediatric populations. To address these challenges, we propose a contrast-free artificial intelligence framework that predicts contrast-enhanced (CE) lesion appearance solely from non-contrast T1, T2, and T2/FLAIR sequences. This is the first study to validate such a paradigm across a multicenter, age-diverse, and histopathologically heterogeneous brain tumor dataset—challenging the clinical reliance on GBCAs. We employ end-to-end segmentation and CE prediction using nnU-Net, SegResNet, and SwinUNETR; nnU-Net achieves optimal performance: balanced accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 91.5%, R² = 0.859 for CE volume prediction, and Dice > 0.7 in 50.2% of cases—surpassing radiologist performance. Our work establishes a generalizable, contrast-free MRI methodology for brain tumor assessment, introducing a novel clinical paradigm.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Brain tumour imaging assessment typically requires both pre- and post-contrast MRI, but gadolinium administration is not always desirable, such as in frequent follow-up, renal impairment, allergy, or paediatric patients. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model capable of predicting brain tumour contrast enhancement from non-contrast MRI sequences alone. We assembled 11089 brain MRI studies from 10 international datasets spanning adult and paediatric populations with various neuro-oncological states, including glioma, meningioma, metastases, and post-resection appearances. Deep learning models (nnU-Net, SegResNet, SwinUNETR) were trained to predict and segment enhancing tumour using only non-contrast T1-, T2-, and T2/FLAIR-weighted images. Performance was evaluated on 1109 held-out test patients using patient-level detection metrics and voxel-level segmentation accuracy. Model predictions were compared against 11 expert radiologists who each reviewed 100 randomly selected patients. The best-performing nnU-Net achieved 83% balanced accuracy, 91.5% sensitivity, and 74.4% specificity in detecting enhancing tumour. Enhancement volume predictions strongly correlated with ground truth (R2 0.859). The model outperformed expert radiologists, who achieved 69.8% accuracy, 75.9% sensitivity, and 64.7% specificity. 76.8% of test patients had Dice over 0.3 (acceptable detection), 67.5% had Dice over 0.5 (good detection), and 50.2% had Dice over 0.7 (excellent detection). Deep learning can identify contrast-enhancing brain tumours from non-contrast MRI with clinically relevant performance. These models show promise as screening tools and may reduce gadolinium dependence in neuro-oncology imaging. Future work should evaluate clinical utility alongside radiology experts.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Predicting brain tumour enhancement without contrast MRI
Reducing gadolinium dependence in neuro-oncology imaging
Developing AI models to segment enhancing tumours noninvasively
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deep learning predicts tumor enhancement from non-contrast MRI
AI models segment tumors using T1, T2, and FLAIR sequences only
nnU-Net outperforms radiologists in detecting enhancing brain tumors
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
James K Ruffle
Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
Samia Mohinta
Samia Mohinta
Data Scientist and PhD student at the University of Cambridge.
Computational NeuroscienceDeep LearningReinforcement LearningConnectomics
Guilherme Pombo
Guilherme Pombo
Nvidia
Deep LearningMachine Learning
A
Asthik Biswas
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
Alan Campbell
Alan Campbell
Biolinq Inc.
Continuous glucose monitoringChemical Wearable SensorsBiosensorsBiofuel Cells
I
Indran Davagnanam
Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
D
David Doig
Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
A
Ahmed Hamman
Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
H
Harpreet Hyare
Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
F
Farrah Jabeen
Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
E
Emma Lim
Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
D
Dermot Mallon
Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
S
Stephanie Owen
Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
S
Sophie Wilkinson
Department of Radiology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Sebastian Brandner
Sebastian Brandner
Professor of Neuropathology, UCL
Neuroscience
Parashkev Nachev
Parashkev Nachev
University College London