🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of core stability verification and existence in Partitioned Combinatorial Optimization Games (PCOGs), focusing on four classical graph optimization problems: Minimum Vertex Cover, Minimum Dominating Set, Minimum Spanning Tree, and Maximum Matching. We systematically embed these combinatorial optimization problems into a partitioned cooperative game framework, where the value of each coalition is defined as the optimal solution value on its induced subgraph. Leveraging game-theoretic modeling, combinatorial optimization analysis, and rigorous complexity-theoretic reductions, we precisely characterize the complexity boundaries—establishing NP-completeness, polynomial-time solvability, and other fine-grained classifications—for both core existence and core membership verification across all four problem classes. Our results provide a rigorous theoretical foundation and concrete algorithmic criteria for distributed collaborative decision-making in multi-agent systems governed by combinatorial resource constraints.
📝 Abstract
We propose a class of cooperative games, called d Partitioned Compbinatorial Optimization Games (PCOGs). The input of PCOG consists of a set of agents and a combinatorial structure (typically a graph) with a fixed optimization goal on this structure (e.g., finding a minimum dominating set on a graph) such that the structure is divided among the agents. The value of each coalition of agents is derived from the optimal solution for the part of the structure possessed by the coalition. We study two fundamental questions related to the core: Core Stability Verification and Core Stability Existence. We analyze the algorithmic complexity of both questions for four classic graph optimization tasks: minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, minimum spanning tree, and maximum matching.