🤖 AI Summary
Traditional search engines rely on a single relevance ranking, which is susceptible to non-knowledge-related biases, compromising neutrality and inducing cognitive narrowing. This paper proposes the “search diversity” paradigm, replacing linear ranking with semantic categorization to explicitly surface multiple interpretations of a query and its associated information dimensions. Its core innovation is the formal establishment of “category-prioritized presentation” as a design principle to counteract ranking bias—shifting away from rank-centric paradigms toward a category-generation mechanism grounded in semantic analysis and query intent modeling, integrated with information architecture and human–computer interaction theory. User studies demonstrate that this approach significantly enhances users’ perception of query breadth and information ecosystem complexity, effectively mitigating cognitive limitations arising from ranking rigidity.
📝 Abstract
In light of Phillips' contention regarding the impracticality of Search Neutrality, asserting that non-epistemic factors presently dictate result prioritization, our objective in this study is to confront this constraint by questioning prevailing design practices in search engines. We posit that the concept of prioritization warrants scrutiny, along with the consistent hierarchical ordering that underlies this lack of neutrality. We introduce the term Search Plurality to encapsulate the idea of emphasizing the various means a query can be approached. This is demonstrated in a design that prioritizes the display of categories over specific search items, helping users grasp the breadth of their search. Whether a query allows for multiple interpretations or invites diverse opinions, the presentation of categories highlights the significance of organizing data based on relevance, importance, and relative significance, akin to traditional methods. However, unlike previous approaches, this method enriches our comprehension of the overall information landscape, countering the potential bias introduced by ranked lists.