Non-wellfounded parsimonious proofs and non-uniform complexity

πŸ“… 2024-04-04
πŸ›οΈ arXiv.org
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This paper addresses the complexity-theoretic characterization of cyclic and non-wellfounded proofs in parsimonious logicβ€”a variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a finite data-stream constructor. We introduce the first proof system integrating non-wellfounded induction with parsimonious logic. By developing continuous cut-elimination and analyzing its polynomial continuity, we establish soundness and completeness of the system. This yields the first exact logical characterizations of the complexity classes FPTIME (polynomial-time computable functions) and FP/poly (non-uniform polynomial-time functions with polynomial advice). Our core innovation lies in embedding non-wellfounded structures into the parsimonious logic framework, combined with polynomial Turing machine encodings and semantics of continuous functions, thereby deriving multiple finite proof systems whose computational complexity precisely captures these classes. Notably, this provides the first non-wellfounded proof-theoretic characterization of a non-uniform complexity class.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
In this paper we investigate the complexity-theoretical aspects of cyclic and non-wellfounded proofs in the context of parsimonious logic, a variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. We present non-wellfounded parsimonious proof systems capturing the classes $mathbf{FPTIME}$ and $mathbf{FP}/mathsf{poly}$. Soundness is established via a polynomial modulus of continuity for continuous cut-elimination. Completeness relies on an encoding of polynomial Turing machines with advice. As a byproduct of our proof methods, we establish a series of characterisation results for various finitary proof systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzing complexity of cyclic non-wellfounded parsimonious proofs
Capturing FPTIME and FP/poly complexity classes
Establishing soundness via polynomial modulus continuity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Non-wellfounded parsimonious proof systems
Polynomial modulus continuity cut-elimination
Encoding polynomial Turing machines advice
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.