Routine laboratory trajectories encode the onset of organ-level complications in cancer

📅 2026-06-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current single-timepoint prognostic models struggle to capture early signals of organ-level complications during cancer therapy. This study proposes a Transformer-based temporal modeling approach that leverages longitudinal routine laboratory data from nearly 4,000 patients with multiple myeloma or ovarian cancer to predict 162 treatment-related complications over the subsequent two years. We demonstrate for the first time that trajectories of routine laboratory values can identify organ dysfunction weeks to months in advance, enabling complication-specific monitoring without additional testing. The model’s generalizability is validated across diverse datasets, including MIMIC-IV and MMRF CoMMpass, spanning different cancer types and healthcare systems. It achieves 1.5–6.1-fold enrichment in prevalence across eight complication categories, with AUROC scores up to 0.85—significantly outperforming non-sequential baselines by as much as 0.11.
📝 Abstract
Routine laboratory panels drawn during cancer treatment constitute longitudinal physiological recordings of organ function, yet their temporal structure is discarded by single-timepoint prognostic tools. A transformer trained on 2,777,595 laboratory measurements from 3,905 patients with multiple myeloma or ovarian cancer predicted the two-year onset of 162 treatment-associated complications, including therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes, spanning eight clinical categories, achieving 1.5- to 6.1-fold enrichment above prevalence at the group level. It matched or outperformed non-sequential baselines across grouped endpoints (AUROC gains up to +0.11), demonstrating that longitudinal laboratory trajectories capture evolving complication-specific physiology inaccessible from isolated measurements. Predictions generalised across both cancers, divergence concentrating in disease-specific complications, and biomarker masking recovered signatures consistent with established pathophysiology. External validation on MIMIC-IV and MMRF CoMMpass confirmed transferability across independent healthcare systems (AUROC up to 0.85). Routine oncological laboratory data encode organ deterioration weeks to months before clinical onset, enabling complication-specific surveillance without additional testing infrastructure.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

longitudinal laboratory trajectories
treatment-associated complications
organ dysfunction
cancer therapy
early prediction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

longitudinal laboratory trajectories
transformer model
treatment-associated complications
early prediction
organ-level deterioration
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow – AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration for Predictive Toxicology
Pfizer
The annual base salary for this position ranges from $64,600.00 to $107,600.00. In addition, this position is eligible for participation in Pfizer’s Global Performance Plan with a bonus target of 7.5% of the base salary. We offer comprehensive and generous benefits and programs to help our colleagues lead healthy lives and to support each of life’s moments. Benefits offered include a 401(k) plan with Pfizer Matching Contributions and an additional Pfizer Retirement Savings Contribution, paid vacation, holiday and personal days, paid caregiver/parental and medical leave, and health benefits to include medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage. Learn more at Pfizer Candidate Site – U.S. Benefits | (uscandidates.mypfizerbenefits.com). Pfizer compensation structures and benefit packages are aligned based on the location of hire. The United States salary range provided does not apply to Tampa, FL or any location outside of the United States. Relocation assistance may be available based on business needs and/or eligibility.
Hybrid
J
Jannik Lübberstedt
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
K
Krischan Braitsch
Department of Medicine III, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
J
Jacqueline Lammert
Chair of Medical Informatics, Institute of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
C
Christof Winter
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
F
Florian Gabriel
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
T
Tristan Lemke
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
C
Christopher Zirn
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
M
Markus Graf
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
F
Friedrich Puttkammer
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
H
Hartmut Häntze
Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes Moll
Johannes Moll
Technical University of Munich, Stanford University
A
Anirudh Narayanan
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
A
Andrei Zhukov
Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
F
Fabian Drexel
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Z
Zeineb Ben Chaaben
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
S
Sebastian Ziegelmayer
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
S
Su Hwan Kim
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
M
Marion Högner
Department of Medicine III, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Jan Kirschke
Jan Kirschke
Dep. of Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München
NeuroradiologyComputational imagingMachine learningBrainSpine
F
Florian Bassermann
Department of Medicine III, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
M
Marcus Makowski
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Christian Wachinger
Christian Wachinger
Technical University of Munich
AI in Medical ImagingGeometric Deep LearningCausal InferenceMulti-Modal Diagnostics
Lisa Adams
Lisa Adams
Assistant Professor of Radiology | Technical University Munich
RadiologyAIMolecular MRI
Keno Bressem
Keno Bressem
Technical University Munich
deep learningradiomicsmicrowave ablation