Sequential Fair Allocation With Replenishments: A Little Envy Goes An Exponentially Long Way

📅 2025-08-29
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies the repeated resource allocation problem under stochastic supply replenishment, focusing on the long-term trade-off between fairness (measured by envy) and efficiency. Motivated by real-world applications such as food banks and medical supply chains, we formulate a stochastic control model with storage capacity constraints and derive a bang-bang–type optimal policy. Our theoretical analysis reveals a sharp phase transition: a marginal increase in the fairness tolerance Δ—i.e., allowing envy up to Δ > 0—reduces efficiency loss from Θ(1/M) to e⁻Ω(ΔM), an exponential improvement. This phenomenon is driven primarily by supply dynamics—not demand uncertainty—and critically depends on storage capacity. To our knowledge, this work provides the first near-tight characterization of the fairness–efficiency trade-off in this setting, accompanied by a matching lower bound proof.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We study the trade-off between envy and inefficiency in repeated resource allocation settings with stochastic replenishments, motivated by real-world systems such as food banks and medical supply chains. Specifically, we consider a model in which a decision-maker faced with stochastic demand and resource donations must trade off between an equitable and efficient allocation of resources over an infinite horizon. The decision-maker has access to storage with fixed capacity $M$, and incurs efficiency losses when storage is empty (stockouts) or full (overflows). We provide a nearly tight (up to constant factors) characterization of achievable envy-inefficiency pairs. Namely, we introduce a class of Bang-Bang control policies whose inefficiency exhibits a sharp phase transition, dropping from $Θ(1/M)$ when $Δ= 0$ to $e^{-Ω(ΔM)}$ when $Δ> 0$, where $Δ$ is used to denote the target envy of the policy. We complement this with matching lower bounds, demonstrating that the trade-off is driven by supply, as opposed to demand uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that envy-inefficiency trade-offs not only persist in settings with dynamic replenishment, but are shaped by the decision-maker's available capacity, and are therefore qualitatively different compared to previously studied settings with fixed supply.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Balancing envy and inefficiency in dynamic resource allocation
Analyzing trade-offs with stochastic demand and replenishments
Characterizing achievable envy-inefficiency pairs with capacity constraints
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bang-Bang control policies for resource allocation
Exponential efficiency gain with minimal envy
Storage capacity-dependent envy-efficiency trade-off analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.