Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning?

πŸ“… 2026-05-14
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work proposes a novel active learning paradigm that eliminates the need for an initially pretrained candidate model, thereby circumventing the substantial computational overhead and procedural complexity of conventional approaches. Instead, the method directly employs randomly initialized CNN and Transformer models for sample selection, guided by high-confidence (HC), low-confidence (LC), and hybrid HCLC sampling strategies. Experimental results demonstrate that the LC strategy consistently achieves superior performance across most scenarios, and the proposed framework attains accuracy comparable to traditional methods reliant on pretrained modelsβ€”yet with markedly enhanced efficiency, flexibility, and practicality across multiple benchmark datasets.
πŸ“ Abstract
Deep learning has profoundly impacted domains such as computer vision and natural language processing by uncovering complex patterns in vast datasets. However, the reliance on extensive labeled data poses significant challenges, including resource constraints and annotation errors, particularly in training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers due to a larger number of parameters. Active learning offers a promising solution to reduce labeling burdens by strategically selecting the most informative samples for annotation. However, the current active learning frameworks are time-intensive which select the samples iteratively with the help of initial candidate models. This study investigates the feasibility of using CNNs and transformers with randomly initialized weights, eliminating the need for initial candidate models while achieving results comparable to active learning frameworks that depend on such candidate models. We evaluate three confidence-based sampling strategies: high confidence (HC), low confidence (LC), and a combination of high confidence in the early stages of training and low confidence at later stages of training (HCLC). Among these, mostly LC demonstrated the best performance in our experiments, showcasing its effectiveness as an active learning strategy without the need for candidate models. Further, extensive experiments verify the robustness of the proposed active learning methods. By challenging traditional frameworks, the proposed work introduces a streamlined approach to active learning, advancing efficiency and flexibility across diverse datasets and domains.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

active learning
candidate models
sample selection
labeling efficiency
deep learning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

active learning
random initialization
confidence-based sampling
candidate-free
deep learning
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
πŸ’Ό Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
H
Harshini Mridula Mohan
SoCSE, R V University, Bengaluru, India.
M
Maanya Manjunath
SoCSE, R V University, Bengaluru, India.
V
Vipul Arya
SoCSE, R V University, Bengaluru, India.
S
S. H. Shabbeer Basha
School of Engineering and Technology, Vidyashilp University, Bengaluru, India.
N
Nitin Cheekatla
Dataplex Inc., USA.