🤖 AI Summary
Existing graph anomaly detection (GAD) methods typically assume identical training and testing distributions and are highly task-specific, leading to severely limited generalizability under realistic conditions such as distribution shift and few-shot settings. To address this, we propose the first systematic, fine-grained taxonomy for GAD generalization, unifying modeling across three dimensions: task formulation, types of distribution shift, and knowledge transfer mechanisms—spanning from traditional transfer learning to foundation models. We introduce the inaugural survey framework dedicated to GAD generalization, integrating state-of-the-art approaches for complex scenarios including cross-domain and low-resource settings. Our analysis explicitly identifies three core challenges: distribution shift correction, mitigation of label scarcity, and enhancement of model transferability. This work fills a critical gap in the literature by providing the first comprehensive, structured overview of GAD generalization, offering a clear technical roadmap and actionable directions for developing general-purpose graph anomaly detection systems.
📝 Abstract
Graph anomaly detection (GAD) has attracted increasing attention in recent years for identifying malicious samples in a wide range of graph-based applications, such as social media and e-commerce. However, most GAD methods assume identical training and testing distributions and are tailored to specific tasks, resulting in limited adaptability to real-world scenarios such as shifting data distributions and scarce training samples in new applications. To address the limitations, recent work has focused on improving the generalization capability of GAD models through transfer learning that leverages knowledge from related domains to enhance detection performance, or developing "one-for-all" GAD foundation models that generalize across multiple applications. Since a systematic understanding of generalization in GAD is still lacking, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of generalization in GAD. We first trace the evolution of generalization in GAD and formalize the problem settings, which further leads to our systematic taxonomy. Rooted in this fine-grained taxonomy, an up-to-date and comprehensive review is conducted for the existing generalized GAD methods. Finally, we identify current open challenges and suggest future directions to inspire future research in this emerging field.