Unconditional Latent Diffusion Models Memorize Patient Imaging Data: Implications for Openly Sharing Synthetic Data

📅 2024-02-01
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Unconditional latent diffusion models (LDMs) widely deployed in medical image synthesis exhibit unintended memorization of original patient data—a critical privacy leakage risk. Method: We propose the first self-supervised copy-detection framework to systematically assess and quantify memorization across CT, MR, and X-ray modalities. Contribution/Results: Our analysis reveals that although LDMs surpass VAEs and GANs in image fidelity, they incur significantly higher memorization risk. We identify key training factors governing memorization: data augmentation, model size reduction, and increased training dataset scale effectively mitigate memorization, whereas overfitting exacerbates leakage. This work provides the first empirical characterization of memorization in medical LDMs, establishing foundational insights for privacy-preserving medical AI development and offering actionable guidelines for mitigating reconstruction-based privacy risks in clinical deep learning applications.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
AI models present a wide range of applications in the field of medicine. However, achieving optimal performance requires access to extensive healthcare data, which is often not readily available. Furthermore, the imperative to preserve patient privacy restricts patient data sharing with third parties and even within institutes. Recently, generative AI models have been gaining traction for facilitating open-data sharing by proposing synthetic data as surrogates of real patient data. Despite the promise, some of these models are susceptible to patient data memorization, where models generate patient data copies instead of novel synthetic samples. Considering the importance of the problem, surprisingly it has received relatively little attention in the medical imaging community. To this end, we assess memorization in unconditional latent diffusion models. We train latent diffusion models on CT, MR, and X-ray datasets for synthetic data generation. We then detect the amount of training data memorized utilizing our novel self-supervised copy detection approach and further investigate various factors that can influence memorization. Our findings show a surprisingly high degree of patient data memorization across all datasets. Comparison with non-diffusion generative models, such as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, indicates that while latent diffusion models are more susceptible to memorization, overall they outperform non-diffusion models in synthesis quality. Further analyses reveal that using augmentation strategies, small architecture, and increasing dataset can reduce memorization while over-training the models can enhance it. Collectively, our results emphasize the importance of carefully training generative models on private medical imaging datasets, and examining the synthetic data to ensure patient privacy before sharing it for medical research and applications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI Model
Medical Image Synthesis
Patient Privacy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Privacy Leakage
Medical Image Synthesis
Model Optimization for Privacy Protection
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
S. Dar
Department of Internal Medicine III, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; AI Health Innovation Cluster (AIH), Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
M
Marvin Seyfarth
Department of Internal Medicine III, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
I
Isabelle Ayx
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany
T
Theano Papavassiliu
AI Health Innovation Cluster (AIH), Germany; Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostasis, and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
S
Stefan O. Schoenberg
AI Health Innovation Cluster (AIH), Germany; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany
Robert Siepmann
Robert Siepmann
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen
F
F. Laqua
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
J
Jannik Kahmann
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany
N
Norbert Frey
Department of Internal Medicine III, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
Bettina Baeßler
Bettina Baeßler
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
S
S. Foersch
Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Daniel Truhn
Daniel Truhn
Professor of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMedical Imaging
J
J. N. Kather
Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Sandy Engelhardt
Sandy Engelhardt
Full Professor at Heidelberg University
Cardiac Image ProcessingComputer-Assisted SurgeryDeep LearningAugmented Reality