🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses conceptual ambiguities in current AI and digital human research concerning the nature of agency, self-identity formation, and ethical challenges. Drawing on evolutionary mechanisms of human consciousness and memory, it introduces a novel paradigm termed “soul computing,” rigorously delineating its narrow and broad interpretations and distinguishing it from affective computing, historical reconstruction, and mortal computing. By integrating large language models, multimodal generation, and explicit modeling of consciousness and memory, the work constructs an agent architecture endowed with intrinsic intentionality, coherent self-identity, and long-term memory. This framework offers both theoretical grounding and technical pathways for transitioning AI from instrumental tools toward agents possessing lifelike subjectivity, thereby advancing the engineering-based reconstruction of the psychological and existential qualities of digital humans.
📝 Abstract
Breakthroughs in large language models and multimodal generation technologies have propelled the digital reconstruction of human mental traits, emotional patterns, and long-term memory from science fiction toward engineering practice. Yet current research and industry practices at the intersection of AI and digital humans remain hampered by fundamental conceptual ambiguities: the essential differences between next-generation intelligent agents and traditional virtual humans, the construction pathways for digital entities possessing self-identity, and the core technical and ethical challenges confronting this domain all demand urgent clarification. This paper systematically examines the transformative logic underlying the transition from traditional virtual humans to the ``Soul Computing'' paradigm, driven by frontier AI technologies. We first analyze the evolutionary patterns of human consciousness and memory mechanisms, reassessing the core value of massive multimodal digital fragments in the reverse reconstruction of individual mental worlds. On this basis, we formally delineate the academic connotations of narrow and broad Soul Computing for the first time, clarifying its academic boundaries and essential distinctions from Affective Computing, Historical Reconstruction, and Mortal Computation. We argue that Soul Computing systems must architecturally construct an ``Intensional'' core rather than serving as purely ``Extensional'' functional carriers, thereby enabling the fundamental transition of AI from toolhood to living agency.