Toward PDDL Planning Copilot

📅 2025-09-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit limited reliability in long-horizon planning within autonomous agent scenarios. Method: We propose the first PDDL-based planning coordination framework grounded in the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling LLMs to invoke external planning toolchains—via natural language instructions—to perform end-to-end tasks including syntax validation, planner selection, plan generation, solution verification, and execution simulation. Crucially, the framework requires no domain-specific fine-tuning and is compatible with any MCP-compliant LLM. Contribution/Results: Extensive experiments across three open-source LLMs demonstrate substantial improvements in planning success rate and accuracy over both tool-free baselines and GPT-4o. These results empirically validate that integrating dedicated symbolic planners significantly enhances LLMs’ long-horizon reasoning capabilities—highlighting both efficacy and broad applicability of tool-augmented planning for autonomous agents.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being used as autonomous agents capable of performing complicated tasks. However, they lack the ability to perform reliable long-horizon planning on their own. This paper bridges this gap by introducing the Planning Copilot, a chatbot that integrates multiple planning tools and allows users to invoke them through instructions in natural language. The Planning Copilot leverages the Model Context Protocol (MCP), a recently developed standard for connecting LLMs with external tools and systems. This approach allows using any LLM that supports MCP without domain-specific fine-tuning. Our Planning Copilot supports common planning tasks such as checking the syntax of planning problems, selecting an appropriate planner, calling it, validating the plan it generates, and simulating their execution. We empirically evaluate the ability of our Planning Copilot to perform these tasks using three open-source LLMs. The results show that the Planning Copilot highly outperforms using the same LLMs without the planning tools. We also conducted a limited qualitative comparison of our tool against Chat GPT-5, a very recent commercial LLM. Our results shows that our Planning Copilot significantly outperforms GPT-5 despite relying on a much smaller LLM. This suggests dedicated planning tools may be an effective way to enable LLMs to perform planning tasks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Bridging LLMs' inability for reliable long-horizon planning autonomously
Integrating multiple planning tools via natural language instructions
Enabling syntax checking, planner selection, and plan validation without fine-tuning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates planning tools via chatbot interface
Uses Model Context Protocol for tool connectivity
Supports planning tasks without domain fine-tuning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yarin Benyamin
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
A
Argaman Mordoch
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
S
Shahaf S. Shperberg
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Roni Stern
Roni Stern
Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the Negev; Palo Alto Research
Artificial IntelligenceProgrammingComputer ScienceHeuristic SearchAI Planning