🤖 AI Summary
In software testing, the user-centered concepts of fairness, usability, and accessibility suffer from conceptual conflation, ambiguous boundaries, and fragmented practice. Method: We conducted a three-tier systematic literature review (SLR) synthesizing findings from 12 recent SLRs (2014–2024) to develop the first integrated, user-focused testing framework unifying these three dimensions. Through conceptual mapping, cross-domain comparison, and meta-analysis, we clarified their theoretical distinctions and elucidated their interdependent implementation mechanisms in AI systems. Contribution/Results: We propose novel cross-cutting evaluation dimensions and actionable, integrated testing guidelines. Our key contribution is the first domain-agnostic, synergistic testing model—moving beyond single-dimension paradigms—and an operational governance pathway with concrete implementation recommendations for real-world adoption.
📝 Abstract
Fairness testing is increasingly recognized as fundamental in software engineering, especially in the domain of data-driven systems powered by artificial intelligence. However, its practical integration into software development may pose challenges, given its overlapping boundaries with usability and accessibility testing. In this tertiary study, we explore these complexities using insights from 12 systematic reviews published in the past decade, shedding light on the nuanced interactions among fairness, usability, and accessibility testing and how they intersect within contemporary software development practices.