Op-Fed: Opinion, Stance, and Monetary Policy Annotations on FOMC Transcripts Using Active Learning

📅 2025-09-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

179K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses two key challenges in identifying monetary policy stances in FOMC meeting minutes: severe class imbalance (non-neutral stance sentences constitute <8%) and heavy reliance on cross-sentence context (65% of instances). To this end, we introduce Op-Fed—a high-quality, context-enhanced dataset comprising 1,044 human-annotated sentences with their surrounding discourse. We propose a five-stage hierarchical annotation framework that decouples opinion, policy, and stance components, integrated with active learning to double the number of rare-class positive samples. Our context-aware annotation schema significantly improves feasibility for fine-grained stance classification. Experiments show that state-of-the-art closed-source LLMs achieve zero-shot accuracy of 0.80 on opinion classification but only 0.61 on stance classification—substantially below the human baseline of 0.89—demonstrating Op-Fed’s rigor and benchmark value. This work establishes the first structured, context-rich, domain-specific resource and methodological paradigm for stance analysis in financial texts.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The U.S. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) regularly discusses and sets monetary policy, affecting the borrowing and spending decisions of millions of people. In this work, we release Op-Fed, a dataset of 1044 human-annotated sentences and their contexts from FOMC transcripts. We faced two major technical challenges in dataset creation: imbalanced classes -- we estimate fewer than 8% of sentences express a non-neutral stance towards monetary policy -- and inter-sentence dependence -- 65% of instances require context beyond the sentence-level. To address these challenges, we developed a five-stage hierarchical schema to isolate aspects of opinion, monetary policy, and stance towards monetary policy as well as the level of context needed. Second, we selected instances to annotate using active learning, roughly doubling the number of positive instances across all schema aspects. Using Op-Fed, we found a top-performing, closed-weight LLM achieves 0.80 zero-shot accuracy in opinion classification but only 0.61 zero-shot accuracy classifying stance towards monetary policy -- below our human baseline of 0.89. We expect Op-Fed to be useful for future model training, confidence calibration, and as a seed dataset for future annotation efforts.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Annotating FOMC transcripts for opinion and monetary policy stance
Addressing class imbalance and inter-sentence context dependence
Evaluating LLM performance on monetary policy classification tasks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Active learning for imbalanced dataset annotation
Hierarchical schema for opinion and stance classification
Context-aware annotation to address inter-sentence dependence
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.