Building Workflows for Interactive Human in the Loop Automated Experiment (hAE) in STEM-EELS

📅 2024-04-10
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In STEM-EELS, sparse critical structures—such as atomic-scale defects—are difficult to identify efficiently and are prone to suboptimal local attention. Method: This paper proposes a human-in-the-loop adaptive experimentation (hAE) framework. It systematically characterizes, for the first time, how deep kernel learning (DKL) hyperparameters influence Bayesian optimization exploration trajectories; introduces a dual-track monitoring mechanism—operating concurrently in feature space and real space—to enable expert real-time intervention; and integrates local structural descriptors, multi-scale spectro-spatial joint modeling, and real-time knowledge-state assessment. Contribution/Results: The framework breaks from conventional uniform sampling paradigms, significantly improving discovery efficiency of target structures while avoiding local optima. It is empirically validated on EELS experiments and generalizable to other spectroscopic imaging techniques, including 4D-STEM.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Exploring the structural, chemical, and physical properties of matter on the nano- and atomic scales has become possible with the recent advances in aberration-corrected electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). However, the current paradigm of STEM-EELS relies on the classical rectangular grid sampling, in which all surface regions are assumed to be of equal a priori interest. This is typically not the case for real-world scenarios, where phenomena of interest are concentrated in a small number of spatial locations. One of foundational problems is the discovery of nanometer- or atomic scale structures having specific signatures in EELS spectra. Here we systematically explore the hyperparameters controlling deep kernel learning (DKL) discovery workflows for STEM-EELS and identify the role of the local structural descriptors and acquisition functions on the experiment progression. In agreement with actual experiment, we observe that for certain parameter combinations the experiment path can be trapped in the local minima. We demonstrate the approaches for monitoring automated experiment in the real and feature space of the system and monitor knowledge acquisition of the DKL model. Based on these, we construct intervention strategies, thus defining human-in the loop automated experiment (hAE). This approach can be further extended to other techniques including 4D STEM and other forms of spectroscopic imaging.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

STEM-EELS
Automated Experimental Design
Nanoscopic Structure Analysis
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deep Kernel Learning
Automated Experiment Design
Nanoscopic and Atomic Structure Analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
U
Utkarsh Pratiush
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Kevin M. Roccapriore
Kevin M. Roccapriore
AtomQ (LOA/Innovation Crossroads @ ORNL)
Atomic engineeringAtomic reprogrammingMetamaterialsAutomated Experiment
Yongtao Liu
Yongtao Liu
R&D Staff, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Autonomous ExperimentAI/MLFerroelectricOptoelectronicScanning Probe Microscopy
G
Gerd Duscher
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
M
M. Ziatdinov
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Sergei V. Kalinin
Sergei V. Kalinin
Weston Fulton Chair Professor, UT Knoxville. Chief Scientist, AI/ML for Physical Sciences, PNNL
AI4Materialsautomated experimentelectron microscopySPMatomic fabrication