Toward Adaptive Non-Intrusive Reduced-Order Models: Design and Challenges

📅 2026-02-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of static reduced-order models (ROMs), which fail when system dynamics evolve beyond the training manifold and lack online adaptability. To overcome this, the authors propose three adaptive, non-intrusive ROM frameworks—Adaptive OpInf, Adaptive NiTROM, and a hybrid strategy—that continuously self-correct by updating both the latent space and reduced dynamics in real time using a sliding data window and controlled computational budget. This approach is the first to guarantee energy stability and physical consistency for non-intrusive ROMs in dynamically evolving scenarios. In perturbed cavity flow tests, the hybrid method maintains bounded energy and physically coherent flow fields even with minimal offline training data; Adaptive NiTROM achieves near-exact energy tracking, while Adaptive OpInf effectively suppresses amplitude drift.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Projection-based Reduced Order Models (ROMs) are often deployed as static surrogates, which limits their practical utility once a system leaves the training manifold. We formalize and study adaptive non-intrusive ROMs that update both the latent subspace and the reduced dynamics online. Building on ideas from static non-intrusive ROMs, specifically, Operator Inference (OpInf) and the recently-introduced Non-intrusive Trajectory-based optimization of Reduced-Order Models (NiTROM), we propose three formulations: Adaptive OpInf (sequential basis/operator refits), Adaptive NiTROM (joint Riemannian optimization of encoder/decoder and polynomial dynamics), and a hybrid that initializes NiTROM with an OpInf update. We describe the online data window, adaptation window, and computational budget, and analyze cost scaling. On a transiently perturbed lid-driven cavity flow, static Galerkin/OpInf/NiTROM drift or destabilize when forecasting beyond training. In contrast, Adaptive OpInf robustly suppresses amplitude drift with modest cost; Adaptive NiTROM is shown to attain near-exact energy tracking under frequent updates but is sensitive to its initialization and optimization depth; the hybrid is most reliable under regime changes and minimal offline data, yielding physically coherent fields and bounded energy. We argue that predictive claims for ROMs must be cost-aware and transparent, with clear separation of training/adaptation/deployment regimes and explicit reporting of online budgets and full-order model queries. This work provides a practical template for building self-correcting, non-intrusive ROMs that remain effective as the dynamics evolve well beyond the initial manifold.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Reduced-Order Models
Adaptive Modeling
Non-Intrusive Methods
Dynamic Systems
Manifold Drift
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

adaptive reduced-order models
non-intrusive modeling
Operator Inference
Riemannian optimization
online adaptation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Amirpasha Hedayat
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48105, MI, USA.
A
Alberto Padovan
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 07102, NJ, USA.
Karthik Duraisamy
Karthik Duraisamy
University of Michigan
Computational ModelingMultiscale ModelingAI-Augmented ScienceTurbulence Modeling & Simulations