🤖 AI Summary
Existing case law retrieval methods for the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) neglect legal semantic intent, leading to inaccurate relevance judgments and hindering both legal professionals’ efficient case searching and secondary-school students’ comprehension. To address this, we propose a legal-concept-guided precedent retrieval framework: (1) it explicitly models the legal intent of queries via conceptualized representations; (2) it introduces a weakly supervised key concept extraction method based on Determinantal Point Processes (DPP), optimizing for both conceptual quality and diversity without annotated data; and (3) it integrates concept generation with semantic-enhanced retrieval. Evaluated on the ECtHR-PCR dataset, our approach achieves significant improvements in retrieval accuracy. Results validate the effectiveness of legal-concept guidance and DPP-driven concept extraction, establishing an interpretable and generalizable semantic modeling paradigm for case law retrieval.
📝 Abstract
Prior case retrieval (PCR) is crucial for legal practitioners to find relevant precedent cases given the facts of a query case. Existing approaches often overlook the underlying semantic intent in determining relevance with respect to the query case. In this work, we propose LeCoPCR, a novel approach that explicitly generate intents in the form of legal concepts from a given query case facts and then augments the query with these concepts to enhance models understanding of semantic intent that dictates relavance. To overcome the unavailability of annotated legal concepts, we employ a weak supervision approach to extract key legal concepts from the reasoning section using Determinantal Point Process (DPP) to balance quality and diversity. Experimental results on the ECtHR-PCR dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of leveraging legal concepts and DPP-based key concept extraction.