DeepExtractor: Time-domain reconstruction of signals and glitches in gravitational wave data with deep learning

📅 2025-01-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Distinguishing genuine astrophysical gravitational-wave signals from transient non-Gaussian noise artifacts (glitches) in detector data remains a critical challenge. Method: We propose DeepExtractor, an end-to-end deep learning framework that decouples noise modeling from residual signal reconstruction—departing from template-based or physics-informed waveform mapping paradigms. Leveraging the Gaussian stationary noise assumption, it integrates time-domain convolutional architectures with residual learning and enables real-time inference on CPU. Contribution/Results: On simulated data, DeepExtractor achieves a median mismatch of only 0.9% in glitch reconstruction. It outperforms BayesWave in accuracy and accelerates per-event processing by 3600× (0.1 s vs. 1 h), while demonstrating robustness on real LIGO data. Its core innovation lies in establishing a model-free, highly generalizable, high-fidelity, and real-time deployable paradigm for joint time-domain reconstruction of gravitational-wave signals and glitches.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Gravitational wave (GW) interferometers, detect faint signals from distant astrophysical events, such as binary black hole mergers. However, their high sensitivity also makes them susceptible to background noise, which can obscure these signals. This noise often includes transient artifacts called"glitches"that can mimic astrophysical signals or mask their characteristics. Fast and accurate reconstruction of both signals and glitches is crucial for reliable scientific inference. In this study, we present DeepExtractor, a deep learning framework designed to reconstruct signals and glitches with power exceeding interferometer noise, regardless of their source. We design DeepExtractor to model the inherent noise distribution of GW interferometers, following conventional assumptions that the noise is Gaussian and stationary over short time scales. It operates by predicting and subtracting the noise component of the data, retaining only the clean reconstruction. Our approach achieves superior generalization capabilities for arbitrary signals and glitches compared to methods that directly map inputs to the clean training waveforms. We validate DeepExtractor's effectiveness through three experiments: (1) reconstructing simulated glitches injected into simulated detector noise, (2) comparing performance with the state-of-the-art BayesWave algorithm, and (3) analyzing real data from the Gravity Spy dataset to demonstrate effective glitch subtraction from LIGO strain data. DeepExtractor achieves a median mismatch of only 0.9% for simulated glitches, outperforming several deep learning baselines. Additionally, DeepExtractor surpasses BayesWave in glitch recovery, offering a dramatic computational speedup by reconstructing one glitch sample in approx. 0.1 seconds on a CPU, compared to BayesWave's processing time of approx. one hour per glitch.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Gravitational Wave Data
Astronomical Event Detection
Noise Discrimination
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

DeepExtractor
Gravitational Wave Data Processing
Noise Reduction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
T
Tom Dooney
Institute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Faculty of Science, Open Universiteit, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
H
Harsh Narola
Institute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Stefano Bromuri
Stefano Bromuri
Open University of the Netherlands
Deep LearningSignal ProcessingHeuristicsNeurosymbolic Reasoning
R
R. Lyana Curier
Faculty of Science, Open Universiteit, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
Chris Van Den Broeck
Chris Van Den Broeck
Institute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
S
Sarah Caudill
Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
D
D. Tan
Faculty of Science, Open Universiteit, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands