๐ค AI Summary
This work addresses the instability of preference judgments from proprietary large language model (LLM) evaluators, which are highly sensitive to version updates and thus yield unreliable short-term assessments. To systematically characterize evaluator-driven preference dynamics, the authors propose EPC, a diagnostic framework that integrates the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), evaluator coupling matrices, JensenโShannon divergence, and output-format confusion analysis. Experiments reveal significant fluctuations in preference coupling and self-evaluation mechanism collapse across versions of models such as GPT-4o, demonstrating the severe limitations of single-snapshot evaluations. The study releases all data and tools publicly, establishing a new paradigm for robust and reliable LLM evaluation.
๐ Abstract
Measurements of proprietary LLM evaluators can become invalid within weeks -- we document one case and provide the diagnostic framework to detect it. We introduce EPC -- comprising the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), evaluator-indexed coupling matrix, and Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) -- and apply it across eight experimental conditions (N=112 main + N=10 ablation = 122 unique repetitions, all reported). Coupling coefficients range from 0.00 to 1.18 across per-condition means (CV approx 0.9, n=8 conditions). Four conditions show strong coupling (N=36; GPT-4o May, GPT-4o-mini, Qwen3.7-plus, DashScope 30r); four collapse to near-zero (N=76; GPT-4o June, qwen-plus N=30, symmetric LR, DeepSeek self-eval). The May-to-June GPT-4o drift -- an N=8 re-replication inverting the study's conclusion -- is the most informative measurement: a diagnostic instrument detecting its own instability demonstrates the fragility it was designed to measure. Self-evaluation (97% zero, JSD=0.003) consistently collapses, though floor effects are possible. Output-format confound analysis finds per-strategy aggregate rho=0.89 but per-instance rho=0.219 (p=0.093); PCI reported as preference-convergence metric. We release EPC with all data. The finding is not any single coupling magnitude but the pattern of version-conditional instability that makes single-snapshot evaluator studies unreliable.