From ambiguous utterances to governed reuse classes: canonicalization, quotient invariance, and conditional decidability

📅 2026-07-10
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of existing semantic caching approaches, which rely on embedding similarity for answer reuse but lack formal modeling of authorization, version control, and request equivalence. The authors propose a mathematically grounded, controllable reuse mechanism based on quotient sets: dialogue requests are parsed into structured representations, and fine-grained reuse chains are constructed via three classes of identity relations—reading, parsing, and reuse. Centered on reuse identity relations, the framework derives linguistic-side quotient objects induced by controlled answer partitions and establishes a reuse architecture that is finitely terminating, policy-admissible, and computationally complete. By integrating precise denotational semantics, aggregative design operators, and closure-stable units, the framework guarantees full computability and goal consistency under an untrusted proposal layer, ensuring that pipeline outputs remain invariant along identity chains in deployment logs and that every reuse instance requires verification via an identity or applicability certificate.
📝 Abstract
Semantic caching defines answer reuse on embedding similarity: two utterances share a stored answer when a similarity score clears a threshold, with no notion of authorization, versioning, or of what makes two demands the same. This note changes the object on which reuse is defined: in a governed domain, reuse should operate on a mathematically characterized quotient of resolved conversational demands, not on a similarity heuristic. Three independently defined relations on resolved utterances -- reading identity, resolution identity, and reuse identity -- form a refinement chain, strict under realized nondegeneracy conditions checkable on deployment logs; the pipeline's outputs are invariant along the chain, and reuse identity is exactly the kernel of the resolution map into the governed answer partition, so the reuse quotient is the utterance-side object that partition induces, not a relabeling of it. Reuse identity licenses the governed query key and its certified answer space; reuse of a particular answer requires resolution identity or an applicability certificate. The supporting layer is stated at exactly the strength proved: exact-denotation normal forms; join aggregation as a design operator, with closure-stable cells characterizing no-escape; total computability of the full pipeline relative to an untrusted proposal layer; policy admissibility for arbitrary proposers -- and provably not factual grounding or intent fidelity; and elicitation terminating after finitely many informative replies, sound under target consistency.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

semantic caching
answer reuse
utterance equivalence
governed systems
quotient invariance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

quotient invariance
reuse identity
governed semantic caching
resolution map
conditional decidability
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Cosimo Spera
Minerva CQ (Bourbaki Intelligent Systems, Inc.), Los Gatos, CA, USA
R
Ray Garcia
Minerva CQ (Bourbaki Intelligent Systems, Inc.), Los Gatos, CA, USA