AI-Assisted Goal Setting Improves Goal Progress Through Social Accountability

📅 2026-03-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of scaling effective career coaching in large populations, where traditional approaches are often hindered by high costs and limited accessibility. Through a pre-registered randomized controlled trial (N=XXX), we compared the impact of a Claude Sonnet–powered large language model AI coach (“Leon”), a structured written reflection questionnaire, and a no-intervention control condition on participants’ progress toward self-set career goals over two weeks. Results indicated that the AI coach significantly enhanced goal progress relative to the control group (d = 0.33, p = .016). Although it did not significantly outperform the questionnaire condition, the AI coach indirectly facilitated goal attainment by strengthening participants’ perceived social accountability (indirect effect = 0.15). These findings highlight simulated social interaction as a key mechanism through which AI coaches can foster accountability, offering a scalable paradigm for career interventions.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Helping people identify and pursue personally meaningful career goals at scale remains a key challenge in applied psychology. Career coaching can improve goal quality and attainment, but its cost and limited availability restrict access. Large language model (LLM)-based chatbots offer a scalable alternative, yet the psychological mechanisms by which they might support goal pursuit remain untested. Here we report a preregistered three-arm randomised controlled trial (N = 517) comparing an AI career coach ("Leon," powered by Claude Sonnet), a matched structured written questionnaire covering closely matched reflective topics, and a no-support control on goal progress at a two-week follow-up. The AI chatbot produced significantly higher goal progress than the control (d = 0.33, p = .016). Compared with the written-reflection condition, the AI did not significantly improve overall goal progress, but it increased perceived social accountability. In the preregistered mediation model, perceived accountability mediated the AI-over-questionnaire effect on goal progress (indirect effect = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31]), whereas self-concordance did not. These findings suggest that AI-assisted goal setting can improve short-term goal progress, and that its clearest added value over structured self-reflection lies in increasing felt accountability.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

goal setting
career coaching
social accountability
AI chatbot
goal progress
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI-assisted goal setting
social accountability
large language model
randomised controlled trial
goal progress
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Michel Schimpf
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
J
Julian Voigt
Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Thomas Bohné
Thomas Bohné
Founder & Head, Cyber-Human Lab, University of Cambridge
perception engineeringaugmented intelligencedigital worker assistance systemshigh performance training and learningexperiments