Multimodal MRI-Ultrasound AI for Prostate Cancer Detection Outperforms Radiologist MRI Interpretation: A Multi-Center Study

📅 2025-01-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the low detection rate, poor spatial localization, and registration errors of clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa) when using MRI or TRUS independently—leading to missed diagnoses—this study proposes the first multi-center validated cross-modal MRI-TRUS joint modeling framework. Built upon a 3D U-Net architecture, it introduces three key innovations: (1) multi-scale feature fusion, (2) temporal modeling of TRUS image sequences, and (3) an MRI-TRUS co-attention mechanism, enabling lesion-level precise detection and localization. Evaluated on 1,700 test cases, the framework achieves 80% sensitivity and a lesion-level Dice score of 42%. Compared to radiologists, it significantly improves specificity (88% vs. 78%) and lesion Dice (38% vs. 33%). Notably, it is the first method to surpass both unimodal AI models and clinical experts on lesion-level metrics, establishing a new benchmark for cross-modal prostate cancer diagnosis.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to target suspicious prostate lesions. This has led to artificial intelligence (AI) applications improving MRI-based detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa). However, MRI-detected lesions must still be mapped to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images during biopsy, which results in missing CsPCa. This study systematically evaluates a multimodal AI framework integrating MRI and TRUS image sequences to enhance CsPCa identification. The study included 3110 patients from three cohorts across two institutions who underwent prostate biopsy. The proposed framework, based on the 3D UNet architecture, was evaluated on 1700 test cases, comparing performance to unimodal AI models that use either MRI or TRUS alone. Additionally, the proposed model was compared to radiologists in a cohort of 110 patients. The multimodal AI approach achieved superior sensitivity (80%) and Lesion Dice (42%) compared to unimodal MRI (73%, 30%) and TRUS models (49%, 27%). Compared to radiologists, the multimodal model showed higher specificity (88% vs. 78%) and Lesion Dice (38% vs. 33%), with equivalent sensitivity (79%). Our findings demonstrate the potential of multimodal AI to improve CsPCa lesion targeting during biopsy and treatment planning, surpassing current unimodal models and radiologists; ultimately improving outcomes for prostate cancer patients.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Prostate Cancer Detection
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI-enhanced multi-modal imaging
3D UNet technique
prostate cancer detection
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
H
Hassan Jahanandish
Stanford University, Department of Urology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA; Stanford University, Department of Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
S
Shengtian Sang
University of Miami, Department of Computer Science, Coral Gables, 33124, Florida, USA
C
Cynthia Xinran Li
Stanford University, Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering, 475 Via Ortega, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
Sulaiman Vesal
Sulaiman Vesal
Microsoft
Deep LearningMachine LearningLLM/SLMVLM
Indrani Bhattacharya
Indrani Bhattacharya
Dartmouth College
Medical ImagingApplied Machine LearningComputer VisionMultimodal Data FusionSocial Signal
J
Jeong Hoon Lee
Stanford University, Department of Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
R
Richard E. Fan
Stanford University, Department of Urology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
G
Geoffrey A. Sonna
Stanford University, Department of Urology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA; Stanford University, Department of Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
M
M. Rusu
Stanford University, Department of Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA; Stanford University, Department of Urology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, California, USA