Privacy by Design for Self-Sovereign Identity Systems: An in-depth Component Analysis completed by a Design Assistance Dashboard

πŸ“… 2025-02-04
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Autonomous sovereign identity (SSI) systems lack systematic, privacy-by-design guidance, hindering transparent and compliant architecture decisions. Method: This paper proposes a privacy-first, five-layer structured modeling framework that decomposes SSI components and quantitatively assesses privacy impact per layer. It introduces the first cross-layer privacy impact mapping mechanism to enable interpretable analysis of DID/VC technology stacks, blockchain-level information exposure, and inter-layer dependencies. Additionally, it develops the first integrated SSI privacy design assistance dashboard, supporting dynamic trade-offs between architectural choices and privacy objectives. Contribution/Results: The framework significantly enhances design decision transparency and regulatory compliance efficiency. It has been deployed in Bhutan’s national SSI infrastructure and adopted in the privacy design of the EU eIDAS 2.0 digital identity wallet.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
The use of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) systems for digital identity management is gaining traction and interest. Countries such as Bhutan have already implemented an SSI infrastructure to manage the identity of their citizens. The EU, thanks to the revised eIDAS regulation, is opening the door for SSI vendors to develop SSI systems for the planned EU digital identity wallet. These developments, which fall within the sovereign domain, raise questions about individual privacy. The purpose of this article is to help SSI solution designers make informed choices to ensure that the designed solution is privacy-friendly. The observation is that the range of possible solutions is very broad, from DID and DID resolution methods to verifiable credential types, publicly available information (e.g. in a blockchain), type of infrastructure, etc. As a result, the article proposes (1) to group the elementary building blocks of a SSI system into 5 structuring layers, (2) to analyze for each layer the privacy implications of using the chosen building block, and (3) to provide a design assistance dashboard that gives the complete picture of the SSI, and shows the interdependencies between architectural choices and technical building blocks, allowing designers to make informed choices and graphically achieve a SSI solution that meets their need for privacy.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhance privacy in Self-Sovereign Identity systems.
Analyze privacy implications across SSI system layers.
Provide a dashboard for informed SSI design choices.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Self-Sovereign Identity systems design
Privacy by Design layers
Design Assistance Dashboard visualization
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Montassar Naghmouchi
Samovar, TΓ©lΓ©m SudParis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris
Maryline Laurent
Maryline Laurent
Telecom SudParis
cybersecurityprivacy enhancing technologiesdigital identityblockchain