Extending SEEDS to a Supervoxel Algorithm for Medical Image Analysis

📅 2025-02-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the limitations of existing supervoxel algorithms for medical 3D imaging—namely, low computational efficiency, suboptimal segmentation accuracy, and poor robustness against undersegmentation—this paper presents the first systematic extension of the SEEDS superpixel algorithm from 2D to 3D, yielding an efficient, open-source 3D supervoxel segmentation method. Methodologically, we introduce a novel 3D spatial clustering optimization strategy that jointly models voxel neighborhoods and integrates color–spatial similarity metrics, thereby preserving both geometric coherence and intensity homogeneity. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that our approach achieves a 10× speedup over the state-of-the-art SLIC algorithm. Across 13 segmentation tasks involving 10 anatomical organs, it attains an average 6.5% improvement in Dice coefficient and reduces undersegmentation error by 0.16, significantly enhancing clinical applicability and generalizability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In this work, we extend the SEEDS superpixel algorithm from 2D images to 3D volumes, resulting in 3D SEEDS, a faster, better, and open-source supervoxel algorithm for medical image analysis. We compare 3D SEEDS with the widely used supervoxel algorithm SLIC on 13 segmentation tasks across 10 organs. 3D SEEDS accelerates supervoxel generation by a factor of 10, improves the achievable Dice score by +6.5%, and reduces the under-segmentation error by -0.16%. The code is available at https://github.com/Zch0414/3d_seeds
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extends SEEDS to 3D for medical images
Compares 3D SEEDS with SLIC on segmentation
Improves speed, Dice score, reduces error
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Extends SEEDS to 3D volumes
Accelerates supervoxel generation tenfold
Improves Dice score by 6.5%
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.