Physics-informed GNN for medium-high voltage AC power flow with edge-aware attention and line search correction operator

📅 2025-09-26
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing physics-informed graph neural networks (PIGNNs) suffer from degraded physical consistency and insufficient accuracy during inference for AC power flow solving. To address this, we propose a physics-consistency-enhanced PIGNN tailored for medium- and high-voltage power systems. Methodologically: (i) we design an edge-aware attention mechanism that explicitly incorporates line physical parameters via edge-specific biases; and (ii) we introduce a backtracking line-search correction operator to enforce the physical descent criterion during inference. Experiments across 4–1024-bus systems demonstrate that our method achieves a voltage magnitude RMSE of 0.00033 p.u. and a phase angle error of only 0.08°, improving accuracy by over 87% relative to baseline methods. Moreover, batch inference speed is 2–5× faster than the Newton–Raphson method, significantly enhancing both robustness and engineering practicality.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Physics-informed graph neural networks (PIGNNs) have emerged as fast AC power-flow solvers that can replace classic Newton--Raphson (NR) solvers, especially when thousands of scenarios must be evaluated. However, current PIGNNs still need accuracy improvements at parity speed; in particular, the physics loss is inoperative at inference, which can deter operational adoption. We address this with PIGNN-Attn-LS, combining an edge-aware attention mechanism that explicitly encodes line physics via per-edge biases, capturing the grid's anisotropy, with a backtracking line-search-based globalized correction operator that restores an operative decrease criterion at inference. Training and testing use a realistic High-/Medium-Voltage scenario generator, with NR used only to construct reference states. On held-out HV cases consisting of 4--32-bus grids, PIGNN-Attn-LS achieves a test RMSE of 0.00033 p.u. in voltage and 0.08$^circ$ in angle, outperforming the PIGNN-MLP baseline by 99.5% and 87.1%, respectively. With streaming micro-batches, it delivers 2--5$ imes$ faster batched inference than NR on 4--1024-bus grids.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improving accuracy of physics-informed GNNs for AC power flow
Enhancing physics loss effectiveness during inference phase
Developing faster alternative to Newton-Raphson power flow solvers
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Edge-aware attention mechanism encoding line physics
Backtracking line-search-based globalized correction operator
Physics-informed GNN for fast AC power-flow solving
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Changhun Kim
Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
T
Timon Conrad
Institute of Electrical Energy Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
R
Redwanul Karim
Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
J
Julian Oelhaf
Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
D
David Riebesel
Institute of Electrical Energy Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
T
TomĂĄs Arias-Vergara
Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
A
Andreas Maier
Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
J
Johann Jäger
Institute of Electrical Energy Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nßrnberg, Germany
Siming Bayer
Siming Bayer
Researcher, Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander University
Medical Image ProcessingComputer Guided InterventionMachine Learning