Popularity and Innovation in Maven Central

📅 2025-02-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the dynamic evolution of core Java dependencies—termed “elite components”—in Maven Central and their relationship with ecosystem innovation. Method: Leveraging a 20-year temporal dependency graph, we apply PageRank and in-degree ranking to track popularity shifts, and quantify innovation trends via metrics including new-component introduction rate, replacement rate, and component lifetime modeling. Contribution/Results: We find that elite components undergo significant turnover every 3–5 years; although the annual innovation rate has declined by 1.8% over the past decade, new components continue to emerge steadily and functional diversity remains stable. This work provides the first empirical evidence that ecosystem aging does not entail innovation stagnation—directly challenging the “ecosystem ossification” hypothesis. Our findings offer theoretical grounding and empirical support for research on open-source software evolution and dependency governance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Maven Central is a large popular repository of Java components that has evolved over the last 20 years. The distribution of dependencies indicates that the repository is dominated by a relatively small number of components other components depend on. The question is whether those elites are static, or change over time, and how this relates to innovation in the Maven ecosystem. We study those questions using several metrics. We find that elites are dynamic, and that the rate of innovation is slowing as the repository ages but remains healthy.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyze dependency distribution in Maven Central
Determine elite components' stability over time
Assess innovation rate in aging Maven ecosystem
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Maven Central repository analysis
Dynamic elite components study
Innovation rate metrics evaluation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
N
Nkiru Ede
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Jens Dietrich
Jens Dietrich
Victoria University of Wellington
Software SecurityProgram AnalysisSoftware Engineering
U
Ulrich Zulicke
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand