Large Language Model for Qualitative Research - A Systematic Mapping Study

📅 2024-11-18
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional qualitative analysis suffers from low efficiency and high subjectivity in large-scale text processing. To address this, this study conducts a systematic mapping study (SMS) to construct, for the first time, a comprehensive knowledge graph of large language model (LLM)-augmented qualitative research, spanning healthcare, education, and social sciences. It systematically characterizes LLM applications across core qualitative tasks—including coding and theme extraction—alongside configuration strategies, methodological foundations, and evaluation metrics. Key contributions include: (1) identifying “human-AI collaboration” as an emerging paradigm; (2) proposing technical pathways to enhance model robustness and mitigate factual hallucinations and contextual limitations; and (3) designing a human-in-the-loop augmentation framework coupled with a multi-dimensional evaluation system. Results demonstrate that LLMs significantly improve analytical efficiency; however, their reliability critically depends on prompt engineering quality and domain-specific adaptation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The exponential growth of text-based data in domains such as healthcare, education, and social sciences has outpaced the capacity of traditional qualitative analysis methods, which are time-intensive and prone to subjectivity. Large Language Models (LLMs), powered by advanced generative AI, have emerged as transformative tools capable of automating and enhancing qualitative analysis. This study systematically maps the literature on the use of LLMs for qualitative research, exploring their application contexts, configurations, methodologies, and evaluation metrics. Findings reveal that LLMs are utilized across diverse fields, demonstrating the potential to automate processes traditionally requiring extensive human input. However, challenges such as reliance on prompt engineering, occasional inaccuracies, and contextual limitations remain significant barriers. This research highlights opportunities for integrating LLMs with human expertise, improving model robustness, and refining evaluation methodologies. By synthesizing trends and identifying research gaps, this study aims to guide future innovations in the application of LLMs for qualitative analysis.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automating qualitative analysis with LLMs
Exploring LLM applications in diverse fields
Addressing LLM challenges in qualitative research
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLMs automate qualitative analysis
Integrate LLMs with human expertise
Improve model robustness and evaluation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Caua Ferreira Barros
Informatics Institute, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil
B
Bruna Borges Azevedo
Informatics Institute, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil
Valdemar Vicente Graciano Neto
Valdemar Vicente Graciano Neto
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Systems-of-SystemsSmart CitiesSoftware ArchitectureSimulationBlockchain
Mohamad Kassab
Mohamad Kassab
Associate Professor in Computer Science, Boston University
Requirements EngineeringSoftware ArchitectureSoftware QualityIoTBlockchain
Marcos Kalinowski
Marcos Kalinowski
Professor, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
Empirical Software EngineeringAI EngineeringAI4SEHuman Aspects in Software Engineering
H
Hugo Alexandre D. do Nascimento
Informatics Institute, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil
M
Michelle C.G.S.P. Bandeira
Faculty of Science and Technology, Federal University of Goias, Aparecida de Goiania, Brazil