Agentic Resource Allocation for Batch Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization in Autonomous Materials Discovery

πŸ“… 2026-10-02
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the limitation of fixed strategies in autonomous materials discovery, which struggle to accommodate dynamic resource constraints and multi-objective optimization requirements. To overcome this challenge, we propose a large language model (LLM)-driven multi-objective Bayesian optimization framework. By employing LLMs as intelligent agents integrated with batch resource allocation algorithms, the system dynamically adjusts search strategies in response to emergent disruptions such as budgetary and timeline constraints, thereby enabling adaptive resource scheduling for alloy design. This adaptive strategy significantly enhances mutual information accumulation while reducing predictive uncertainty. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach comprehensively outperforms conventional fixed mixture strategies, establishing a novel paradigm for autonomous scientific discovery under complex constraints.
πŸ“ Abstract
The discovery and development of advanced materials is a challenging process constrained by the high time and monetary costs of synthesis, processing, and characterization. The underlying design spaces can be enormous, often with multiple competing objectives. Bayesian optimization (BO) provides a principled approach for efficiently navigating such spaces, but most workflows rely on fixed exploration-exploitation policies that lack the capacity to adapt to shifting constraints in dynamic campaigns typical of self-driving laboratories. In this work, we develop a multi-objective BO framework for alloy design under resource constraints, benchmarking strategies for adaptive policy tuning at each iteration. Our evaluation covers a septenary refractory high-entropy alloy (RHEA) system focused on maximizing melting temperature and minimizing density, and an Fe-Co-Ni-based soft magnetic alloy system targeting saturation magnetization, coercivity, and hardness. We compare an exploitation-focused strategy, a fixed mixed exploratory/exploitative policy, and two distinct LLM-based adaptive strategies with different approaches to batch allocation and campaign signal interpretation, evaluated across baseline and mid-campaign resource event conditions including budget reductions, timeline cuts, and combined disruptions. Our results show that mixed allocation strategies accumulate substantially more mutual information than the exploitation-focused baseline at a proportionally smaller cost to hypervolume and optimization speed, with adaptive strategies outperforming a fixed-mixed allocation policy by adjusting their allocation in response to both evolving campaign statistics and resource constraints. These findings suggest that adaptive resource allocation offers a favorable tradeoff for materials discovery campaigns in reducing predictive uncertainty on Pareto-optimal compositions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Bayesian Optimization
Multi-Objective Optimization
Resource Allocation
Materials Discovery
Self-Driving Laboratories
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Agentic Resource Allocation
Large Language Models
Adaptive Policy Tuning
Autonomous Materials Discovery
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
πŸ’Ό Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
R
Robert Robinson
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
S
Shakti Prasad Padhy
J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
S
Sushant Sinha
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
S
Sk Md Ahnaf Akif Alvi
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
J
Juan Florez Coronel
J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
Brent Vela
Brent Vela
Postdoctoral Researcher, Texas A&M University
Additive ManufacturingBayesian OptimizationAlloy Design
T
Trevor Hastings
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA
Douglas Allaire
Douglas Allaire
Associate Professor, Texas A&M University
optimizationuncertainty quantificationmultifidelity methodsmachine learning
R
Raymundo ArrΓ³yave
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA; J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA; Wm Michael Barnes ’64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College Station, 77843, TX, USA