ClimateBench v2.0: Probabilistic Climate Model Benchmarking

📅 2026-10-03
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the absence of unified evaluation criteria for climate models projecting regional temperature and humidity in the 2050s by proposing a three-tier probabilistic benchmark framework encompassing physical plausibility, observational fidelity, and paleoclimate extrapolation. Methodologically, it leverages post-2015 withheld data to achieve genuine out-of-sample validation and employs perfect-model experiments to quantify information value. The assessment integrates multiple dimensions through the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), energy conservation diagnostics, and distributional consistency checks. By open-sourcing all code and datasets, this work establishes an equitable comparison platform for multi-paradigm climate models and provides a quantifiable evaluation system for tracking progress in climate projections.
📝 Abstract
We present ClimateBench v2, a standardized protocol for evaluating climate models on diagnostics expected to be informative for their skill in projecting mid-century regional temperature and precipitation changes. The protocol is designed to evaluate any physics-based, data-driven, or hybrid climate model on equal footing using a common set of observational and out-of-distribution tests. We define three tiers of evaluation. Tier I establishes physical credibility through entry-ticket tests of energy conservation, coupled (co-)variability, and basic forced responses. Tier II scores models against post-2015 observations of surface temperature, precipitation, radiative fluxes, sea ice, and key modes of variability using fair CRPS as the primary probabilistic score, complemented by distributional and ensemble-consistency diagnostics. Tier III tests out-of-distribution generalization through paleoclimate simulations spanning the Last Interglacial, Last Glacial Maximum, and Mid-Holocene, and through perfect-model experiments in which data-driven models must predict the future climate of existing Earth system models from historical data alone. We reserve all observational data after 2015 for testing, and submissions must include multiple ensemble members to enable probabilistic evaluation. This reservation exploits a new opportunity provided by the decade of observations accumulated since the end of the CMIP6 historical experiment, which constitutes an out-of-sample record of forced climate change (and internal variability) for the current generation of models, and we quantify, in an idealized setting, the information it carries about mid-century warming. We provide the evaluation code, observational reference datasets, and perfect-model training data as an open benchmark to drive measurable progress in climate projection across all modeling approaches.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

climate model evaluation
benchmarking
probabilistic forecasting
out-of-distribution generalization
temperature and precipitation projection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Probabilistic Evaluation
Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Climate Model Benchmarking
Data-driven Climate Models
CRPS
Duncan Watson-Parris
Duncan Watson-Parris
University of California San Diego
Atmospheric PhysicsCloudsAerosols
W
Willa Tobin
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego
A
Aytaç Paçal
University of Tübingen, connAIx Research School for Applied AI, Heilbronn, Germany
M
Manuel Schlund
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
V
V. Balaji
Schmidt Sciences
K
Kevin Bowman
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
C
Chris Bretherton
Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
P
Peter M. Caldwell
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Will Chapman
Will Chapman
University of Colorado Boulder
WeatherClimateForecastingMachine Learning
W
William D. Collins
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of East Anglia
G
Gregory S. Elsaesser
Columbia University
Pierre Gentine
Pierre Gentine
Professor @ Columbia University - Director NSF LEAP STC
climate changeclimate modelingecohydrologymachine learning
H
Helene Hewitt
Met Office, Exeter, UK
Stephan Hoyer
Stephan Hoyer
Google Research
R
Ralph Keeling
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego
N
Nikolay Koldunov
Alfred Wegener Institute
D
David M. Lawrence
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Christian Lessig
Christian Lessig
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
climate simulationapplied mathematicscomputer graphics
D
Daniel J. Lunt
University of Bristol, UK
J
J. David Neelin
University of California, Los Angeles
M
Mike Pritchard
NVIDIA Research
S
Sarah Purkey
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego
Gavin Schmidt
Gavin Schmidt
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Tapio Schneider
Tapio Schneider
Professor, California Institute of Technology
Atmosphere and climate dynamics
M
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute