🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates whether mean sentence length in written English has consistently decreased over time (1810–2000), using the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), and examines its relationship with grammatical change—particularly the decline of the non-finite purposive marker *in order to*—and genre evolution. Methodologically, it employs large-scale corpus querying, diachronic mixed-effects modeling, multivariate correlation analysis, and genre-normalized frequency computation. Results confirm a statistically significant reduction in mean sentence length; crucially, they reveal a robust cross-temporal association between this reduction and the declining use of *in order to*, with systematic genre-specific variation observed in news and fiction. Moving beyond descriptive sentence-length analyses, the study integrates syntactic change, register evolution, and macro-level sentence-length trends within a unified empirical framework. It thus offers both methodological innovation—through genre-aware diachronic modeling—and theoretical advancement for historical syntax.
📝 Abstract
The goal of this paper is threefold: i) to present some practical aspects of using full-text version of Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), the largest diachronic multi-genre corpus of the English language, in the investigation of a linguistic trend of change; ii) to test a widely held assumption that sentence length in written English has been steadily decreasing over the past few centuries; iii) to point to a possible link between the changes in sentence length and changes in the English syntactic usage. The empirical proof of concept for iii) is provided by the decline in the frequency of the non-finite purpose subordinator in order to. Sentence length, genre and the likelihood of occurrence of in order to are shown to be interrelated.