Think Smart, Not Hard: Difficulty Adaptive Reasoning for Large Audio Language Models

๐Ÿ“… 2025-09-26
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) lack fine-grained, depth-aware control mechanisms during inference, leading to over-reasoning on simple queries and under-reasoning on complex ones. Method: This paper proposes a difficulty-aware adaptive reasoning framework. Its core innovation is the first-ever fine-grained difficulty-adaptive reward function that dynamically couples reasoning length with real-time problem difficulty estimation; integrated with chain-of-thought prompting, it enables stepwise, on-the-fly adjustment of reasoning steps. Results: Experiments demonstrate that the method improves task performance while significantly reducing average reasoning lengthโ€”by up to 37%โ€”thereby jointly enhancing both inference efficiency and accuracy. The framework establishes a novel paradigm for efficient, controllable reasoning in LALMs.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs), powered by the chain-of-thought (CoT) paradigm, have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities. Intuitively, different problems often require varying depths of reasoning. While some methods can determine whether to reason for a given problem, they typically lack a fine-grained mechanism to modulate how much to reason. This often results in a ``one-size-fits-all'' reasoning depth, which generates redundant overthinking for simple questions while failing to allocate sufficient thought to complex ones. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of LALMs and find that an effective and efficient LALM should reason smartly by adapting its reasoning depth to the problem's complexity. To achieve this, we propose a difficulty-adaptive reasoning method for LALMs. Specifically, we propose a reward function that dynamically links reasoning length to the model's perceived problem difficulty. This reward encourages shorter, concise reasoning for easy tasks and more elaborate, in-depth reasoning for complex ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method is both effective and efficient, simultaneously improving task performance and significantly reducing the average reasoning length. Further analysis on reasoning structure paradigm offers valuable insights for future work.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Adapt reasoning depth to problem complexity
Prevent overthinking on simple audio tasks
Allocate sufficient thought for complex audio questions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Difficulty-adaptive reasoning adjusts depth to complexity
Dynamic reward links reasoning length to problem difficulty
Shorter reasoning for easy tasks, deeper for complex ones
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zhichao Sheng
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Shilin Zhou
Shilin Zhou
School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University
Machine LearningNatural Language Processing
C
Chen Gong
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Z
Zhenghua Li
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China